각막보전 방법에 따른 이식편의 거부반응 차이
각막보존 방법에 따라 각막이식 후 발생한 각막이식편 거부반응의 차이를 알아보기 위해 1991년부터 1995년까지 원추각막이나 각막이영양증으로 부분 전층각막이식술을 받았던 50명, 71안을 Moist chamber군(I군)과 Optisol군(II군)으로 나누어 비교하였다. 이식편 거부반응은 I군이 40안중 10안(25%), II군이 31안중 9안(29%)에서 일어났으며, 이중 각막혼탁이 지속되었던 경우는 I군에서 40안중 5안(12.5%)이었고, II군은 31안중 3안 (9.7%)으로 두 가지 경우에서 두 군간 통계학적인 차이가 없었...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Daihan angwa haghoi jabji 1998-07, Vol.39 (7), p.1340-1344 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | kor |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1344 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1340 |
| container_title | Daihan angwa haghoi jabji |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | 이의태 Eui Tae Lee 명윤원 Yoon Won Myong 신정아 Jeong Ah Shin |
| description | 각막보존 방법에 따라 각막이식 후 발생한 각막이식편 거부반응의 차이를 알아보기 위해 1991년부터 1995년까지 원추각막이나 각막이영양증으로 부분 전층각막이식술을 받았던 50명, 71안을 Moist chamber군(I군)과 Optisol군(II군)으로 나누어 비교하였다. 이식편 거부반응은 I군이 40안중 10안(25%), II군이 31안중 9안(29%)에서 일어났으며, 이중 각막혼탁이 지속되었던 경우는 I군에서 40안중 5안(12.5%)이었고, II군은 31안중 3안
(9.7%)으로 두 가지 경우에서 두 군간 통계학적인 차이가 없었다(P |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kiss_kyobo</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kyobo_bookcenter_4010024308248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>1966017</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>1966017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-k508-a5f8bfef8dacc581a87c85859a6ad6d2ee5140697d9dde178625637dcaf681293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjD9Lw0AcQG9QsNR-ApcsjoG73L_fLYIU_0HBpXu45C4QokYSl24KLiKIgmKXgIuo26lF-pl653ewYKc3vMdbQz1MJcSCSbKBBm1bZhgTwgAU6aGdhbvybzf-exZeriPvPvzXU3i-j_yj86_zKHSzcNv93s1DN40Wn87_XHo3Dd1DFNz7Um6i9UKftHawYh-N9_fGw8N4dHxwNNwdxRXHEGteQFbYAozOcw5Eg8yBA1daaCNMYi0nDAsljTLGEgki4YJKk-tCAEkU7aPt_201qbM6zeq6yu3ZhW1ShgnGCaMYEgbLbmvVlW2bnjflqW4mKVFCYCLpH00oYBc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>각막보전 방법에 따른 이식편의 거부반응 차이</title><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><creator>이의태 ; Eui Tae Lee ; 명윤원 ; Yoon Won Myong ; 신정아 ; Jeong Ah Shin</creator><creatorcontrib>이의태 ; Eui Tae Lee ; 명윤원 ; Yoon Won Myong ; 신정아 ; Jeong Ah Shin</creatorcontrib><description>각막보존 방법에 따라 각막이식 후 발생한 각막이식편 거부반응의 차이를 알아보기 위해 1991년부터 1995년까지 원추각막이나 각막이영양증으로 부분 전층각막이식술을 받았던 50명, 71안을 Moist chamber군(I군)과 Optisol군(II군)으로 나누어 비교하였다. 이식편 거부반응은 I군이 40안중 10안(25%), II군이 31안중 9안(29%)에서 일어났으며, 이중 각막혼탁이 지속되었던 경우는 I군에서 40안중 5안(12.5%)이었고, II군은 31안중 3안
(9.7%)으로 두 가지 경우에서 두 군간 통계학적인 차이가 없었다(P<0.05). 따라서 각막보존 방법중 저장기간이 짧은 Moist chamber법과 저장기간이 길어 혈청학적,면역학적 검사가 가능한 Optisol법 사이에 각막이식편 거부반응 결과에는 차이가 없음을 알 수있었다(한안지 39:1340~1344, 1998).
To know the difference in graft rejection after corneal transplantation between moist chamber and Optisol(Chiron Co. Irvine, CA, U.S.A.) as cornea preservation methods, we compared two groups involving 50 patients(71 eyes) who had undergone partially penetrating keratoplasty (PPKP) for the treatment of keratoconus or corneal dystrophy from 1991 to1995. The graft rejection had occurred in 10 of 40 eyes(25%) in moist chamber group and 9 of 31 eyes(29%) in Optisol group, and the cases of permanent corneal opacity after rejection were 5 of 40 eyes(12.5%), 3 of 31 eyes(9.7%) respectively. No difference in the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). We found the fact that the difference did not exist in the results from graft rejection after PPKP using moist chamber method for short preservation period, or Optisol method for the relatively long period allowing sero- logical and immunological screen test(J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 39:1340~ 1344, 1998).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-6471</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한안과학회</publisher><subject>Graft rejection ; Moist chamber ; Optisol ; Partially penetrating keratoplasty (PPKP)</subject><ispartof>Daihan angwa haghoi jabji, 1998-07, Vol.39 (7), p.1340-1344</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT(C) KYOBO BOOK CENTRE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>이의태</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eui Tae Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>명윤원</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon Won Myong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>신정아</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong Ah Shin</creatorcontrib><title>각막보전 방법에 따른 이식편의 거부반응 차이</title><title>Daihan angwa haghoi jabji</title><addtitle>대한안과학회지</addtitle><description>각막보존 방법에 따라 각막이식 후 발생한 각막이식편 거부반응의 차이를 알아보기 위해 1991년부터 1995년까지 원추각막이나 각막이영양증으로 부분 전층각막이식술을 받았던 50명, 71안을 Moist chamber군(I군)과 Optisol군(II군)으로 나누어 비교하였다. 이식편 거부반응은 I군이 40안중 10안(25%), II군이 31안중 9안(29%)에서 일어났으며, 이중 각막혼탁이 지속되었던 경우는 I군에서 40안중 5안(12.5%)이었고, II군은 31안중 3안
(9.7%)으로 두 가지 경우에서 두 군간 통계학적인 차이가 없었다(P<0.05). 따라서 각막보존 방법중 저장기간이 짧은 Moist chamber법과 저장기간이 길어 혈청학적,면역학적 검사가 가능한 Optisol법 사이에 각막이식편 거부반응 결과에는 차이가 없음을 알 수있었다(한안지 39:1340~1344, 1998).
To know the difference in graft rejection after corneal transplantation between moist chamber and Optisol(Chiron Co. Irvine, CA, U.S.A.) as cornea preservation methods, we compared two groups involving 50 patients(71 eyes) who had undergone partially penetrating keratoplasty (PPKP) for the treatment of keratoconus or corneal dystrophy from 1991 to1995. The graft rejection had occurred in 10 of 40 eyes(25%) in moist chamber group and 9 of 31 eyes(29%) in Optisol group, and the cases of permanent corneal opacity after rejection were 5 of 40 eyes(12.5%), 3 of 31 eyes(9.7%) respectively. No difference in the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). We found the fact that the difference did not exist in the results from graft rejection after PPKP using moist chamber method for short preservation period, or Optisol method for the relatively long period allowing sero- logical and immunological screen test(J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 39:1340~ 1344, 1998).</description><subject>Graft rejection</subject><subject>Moist chamber</subject><subject>Optisol</subject><subject>Partially penetrating keratoplasty (PPKP)</subject><issn>0378-6471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjD9Lw0AcQG9QsNR-ApcsjoG73L_fLYIU_0HBpXu45C4QokYSl24KLiKIgmKXgIuo26lF-pl653ewYKc3vMdbQz1MJcSCSbKBBm1bZhgTwgAU6aGdhbvybzf-exZeriPvPvzXU3i-j_yj86_zKHSzcNv93s1DN40Wn87_XHo3Dd1DFNz7Um6i9UKftHawYh-N9_fGw8N4dHxwNNwdxRXHEGteQFbYAozOcw5Eg8yBA1daaCNMYi0nDAsljTLGEgki4YJKk-tCAEkU7aPt_201qbM6zeq6yu3ZhW1ShgnGCaMYEgbLbmvVlW2bnjflqW4mKVFCYCLpH00oYBc</recordid><startdate>19980715</startdate><enddate>19980715</enddate><creator>이의태</creator><creator>Eui Tae Lee</creator><creator>명윤원</creator><creator>Yoon Won Myong</creator><creator>신정아</creator><creator>Jeong Ah Shin</creator><general>대한안과학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope><scope>P5Y</scope><scope>SSSTE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980715</creationdate><title>각막보전 방법에 따른 이식편의 거부반응 차이</title><author>이의태 ; Eui Tae Lee ; 명윤원 ; Yoon Won Myong ; 신정아 ; Jeong Ah Shin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-k508-a5f8bfef8dacc581a87c85859a6ad6d2ee5140697d9dde178625637dcaf681293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Graft rejection</topic><topic>Moist chamber</topic><topic>Optisol</topic><topic>Partially penetrating keratoplasty (PPKP)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>이의태</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eui Tae Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>명윤원</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon Won Myong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>신정아</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong Ah Shin</creatorcontrib><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS)</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><collection>Kyobo Scholar (교보스콜라)</collection><collection>Scholar(스콜라)</collection><jtitle>Daihan angwa haghoi jabji</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>이의태</au><au>Eui Tae Lee</au><au>명윤원</au><au>Yoon Won Myong</au><au>신정아</au><au>Jeong Ah Shin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>각막보전 방법에 따른 이식편의 거부반응 차이</atitle><jtitle>Daihan angwa haghoi jabji</jtitle><addtitle>대한안과학회지</addtitle><date>1998-07-15</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1340</spage><epage>1344</epage><pages>1340-1344</pages><issn>0378-6471</issn><abstract>각막보존 방법에 따라 각막이식 후 발생한 각막이식편 거부반응의 차이를 알아보기 위해 1991년부터 1995년까지 원추각막이나 각막이영양증으로 부분 전층각막이식술을 받았던 50명, 71안을 Moist chamber군(I군)과 Optisol군(II군)으로 나누어 비교하였다. 이식편 거부반응은 I군이 40안중 10안(25%), II군이 31안중 9안(29%)에서 일어났으며, 이중 각막혼탁이 지속되었던 경우는 I군에서 40안중 5안(12.5%)이었고, II군은 31안중 3안
(9.7%)으로 두 가지 경우에서 두 군간 통계학적인 차이가 없었다(P<0.05). 따라서 각막보존 방법중 저장기간이 짧은 Moist chamber법과 저장기간이 길어 혈청학적,면역학적 검사가 가능한 Optisol법 사이에 각막이식편 거부반응 결과에는 차이가 없음을 알 수있었다(한안지 39:1340~1344, 1998).
To know the difference in graft rejection after corneal transplantation between moist chamber and Optisol(Chiron Co. Irvine, CA, U.S.A.) as cornea preservation methods, we compared two groups involving 50 patients(71 eyes) who had undergone partially penetrating keratoplasty (PPKP) for the treatment of keratoconus or corneal dystrophy from 1991 to1995. The graft rejection had occurred in 10 of 40 eyes(25%) in moist chamber group and 9 of 31 eyes(29%) in Optisol group, and the cases of permanent corneal opacity after rejection were 5 of 40 eyes(12.5%), 3 of 31 eyes(9.7%) respectively. No difference in the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). We found the fact that the difference did not exist in the results from graft rejection after PPKP using moist chamber method for short preservation period, or Optisol method for the relatively long period allowing sero- logical and immunological screen test(J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 39:1340~ 1344, 1998).</abstract><pub>대한안과학회</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0378-6471 |
| ispartof | Daihan angwa haghoi jabji, 1998-07, Vol.39 (7), p.1340-1344 |
| issn | 0378-6471 |
| language | kor |
| recordid | cdi_kyobo_bookcenter_4010024308248 |
| source | KoreaMed Open Access |
| subjects | Graft rejection Moist chamber Optisol Partially penetrating keratoplasty (PPKP) |
| title | 각막보전 방법에 따른 이식편의 거부반응 차이 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T07%3A11%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss_kyobo&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EA%B0%81%EB%A7%89%EB%B3%B4%EC%A0%84%20%EB%B0%A9%EB%B2%95%EC%97%90%20%EB%94%B0%EB%A5%B8%20%EC%9D%B4%EC%8B%9D%ED%8E%B8%EC%9D%98%20%EA%B1%B0%EB%B6%80%EB%B0%98%EC%9D%91%20%EC%B0%A8%EC%9D%B4&rft.jtitle=Daihan%20angwa%20haghoi%20jabji&rft.au=%EC%9D%B4%EC%9D%98%ED%83%9C&rft.date=1998-07-15&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1340&rft.epage=1344&rft.pages=1340-1344&rft.issn=0378-6471&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss_kyobo%3E1966017%3C/kiss_kyobo%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=1966017&rfr_iscdi=true |