Body composition and blood pressure in 6-year-old singletons born after pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic and structural chromosomal aberrations: a matched cohort study

STUDY QUESTION: Does Day 3 embryo biopsy for pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic (PGT-M) and structural chromosomal aberrations (PGT-SR) affect body composition and blood pressure readings of 6-year-old singletons? SUMMARY ANSWER: This study of 87 PGT-M and PGT-SR conceived singletons showed no differences in anthropometric measurements and blood pressure readings in comparison with a matched cohort of peers born after ICSI without embryo biopsy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: While neonatal outcomes after PGT conception have been found comparable to those after ICSI without embryo biopsy, only a few studies have reported outcomes after PGT at older ages. Moreover, embryo biopsy is also applied in couples who opt for PGT-M and PGT-SR and hence are not necessarily infertile. Health parameters and in particular body composition data in this group of children are lacking. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This single-centre matched-pair cohort study evaluated body composition of 6-year-old children born after fresh blastocyst embryo transfer with or without embryo biopsy performed at Day 3 for the purpose of PGT-M and PGT-SR. For each child born after embryo biopsy, a singleton born after transfer of a fresh ICSI embryo at the blastocyst stage and reaching the age of 6 years between May 2011 and June 2017 was matched as closely as possible for gender, age, maternal educational level and birth order. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Anthropometry (weight, height, BMI, skinfold thickness, waist and mid-upper arm circumference) and blood pressure readings in a longitudinally followed cohort of 87 singletons conceived by PGT-M and PGT-SR and a pairwise matched sample of 87 children conceived by ICSI are described. Results are adjusted for current, neonatal and parental characteristics. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: From the 124 eligible PGT-M and PGT-SR families, 110 could be reached of whom 23 refused and 87 (87/110 = 79%) participated. All anthropometric measurements, including z-scores of BMI, waist and mid-upper arm circumference, were comparable between the PGT-M and PGT-SR (-0.23; 0.27; 0.17, respectively) and ICSI (-0.29; 0.11; 0.11, respectively) groups (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, indices of peripheral (triceps) and central (subscapular) adiposity derived from skinfold thickness were comparable (PGT-M and PGT-SR: 14.7 mm; 11.6 mm and ICSI: 15.5 mm; 11.5 mm) as well as the percentage total body fat mass derived from these (PGT-M and PGT-SR: 13.