Survey on fan-beam computed tomography for radiotherapy: Imaging for dose calculation and delineation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To obtain an understanding of current practice, professional needs and future directions in the field of fan-beam CT in RT, a survey was conducted. This work presents the collected information regarding the use of CT imaging for dose calculation and structure delineation. MAT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2024-01, Vol.29
Hauptverfasser: Decabooter, Esther, Hilgers, Guido C, De Rouck, Joke, Salvo, Koen, Van Wingerden, Jacobus, Bosmans, Hilde, van der Heyden, Brent, Qamhiyeh, Sima, Papalazarou, Chrysi, Kaatee, Robert, Pittomvils, Geert, Bogaert, Evelien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To obtain an understanding of current practice, professional needs and future directions in the field of fan-beam CT in RT, a survey was conducted. This work presents the collected information regarding the use of CT imaging for dose calculation and structure delineation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online institutional survey was distributed to medical physics experts employed at Belgian and Dutch radiotherapy institutions to assess the status, challenges, and future directions of QA practices for fan-beam CT. A maximum of 143 questions covered topics such as CT scanner availability, CT scanner specifications, QA protocols, treatment simulation workflow, and radiotherapy dose calculation. Answer forms were collected between 1-Sep-2022 and 10-Oct-2022. RESULTS: A 66 % response rate was achieved, yielding data on a total of 58 CT scanners. For MV photon therapy, all single-energy CT scans are reconstructed in Hounsfield Units for delineation or dose calculation, and a direct- or stoichiometric method was used to convert CT numbers for dose calculation. Limited use of dual-energy CT is reported for photon (N = 3) and proton dose calculations (N = 1). For brachytherapy, most institutions adopt water-based dose calculation, while approximately 26 % of the institutions take tissue heterogeneity into account. Commissioning and regular QA include eleven tasks, which are performed by two or more professions (29/31) with varying frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: Dual usage of a planning CT limits protocol optimization for both tissue characterization and delineation. DECT has been implemented only gradually. A variation of QA testing frequencies and tests are reported.
ISSN:2405-6316
2405-6316