ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC)

The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be transla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY 2023-10, Vol.34 (10), p.849-866
Hauptverfasser: Loibl, S, Azim, H.A, Bachelot, T, Berveiller, P, Bosch, A, Cardonick, E, Denkert, C, Halaska, M.J, Hoeltzenbein, M, Johansson, A.L.V, Maggen, C, Markert, U.R, Peccatori, F, Poortmans, P, Saloustros, E, Saura, C, Schmid, P, Stamatakis, E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M, van Gerwen, M, Vandecaveye, V, Pentheroudakis, G, Curigliano, G, Amant, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be translated to PrBC, because both the interests of the mother and of the unborn should be considered. Evidence remains limited and/or conflicting in some specific areas where the optimal approach remains controversial. In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary group of experts and develop statements on controversial topics that cannot be adequately addressed in the current evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The aim of this consensus-building process was to discuss controversial issues relating to the management of patients with PrBC. The virtual meeting included a multidisciplinary panel of 24 leading experts from 13 countries and was chaired by S. Loibl and F. Amant. All experts were allocated to one of four different working groups. Each working group covered a specific subject area with two chairs appointed: Planning, preparation and execution of the consensus process was conducted according to the ESMO standard operating procedures.
ISSN:0923-7534