European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice. METHODS: Qua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.3-14
Hauptverfasser: Cibula, David, Planchamp, Francois, Fischerova, Daniela, Fotopoulou, Christina, Kohler, Christhardt, Landoni, Fabio, Mathevet, Patrice, Naik, Raj, Ponce, Jordi, Raspagliesi, Francesco, Rodolakis, Alexandros, Tamussino, Karl, Taskiran, Cagatay, Vergote, Ignace, Wimberger, Pauline, Eriksson, Ane Gerda Zahl, Querleu, Denis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice. METHODS: Quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives. RESULTS: Fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes. DISCUSSION: Implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.
ISSN:1048-891X