Tracks as frames of reference for academic self-concept

This study compared the development of academic self-concepts between different educational programs. A longitudinal cohort study in Flanders (3205 students in 46 schools) was used to compare students' academic self-concepts during the first three years of secondary education. General academic self-concept, self-concept in mathematics and self-concept in Dutch were measured. The investigated educational programs, called tracks, differ in the extent they are academically or vocationally focused and differ in average student academic ability. To control for selection effects, students who are comparable across the four tracks were matched using propensity score matching, Mahalanobis distance matching and coarsened exact matching. By means of multiple indicator quadratic latent growth curves, pairs of tracks that are hierarchically consecutive were compared regarding the development in academic self-concepts. For the two highest tracks, it was beneficial to be allocated to the highest track, whereas the pairwise comparisons between the three lower tracks indicated a detrimental effect of being in a higher track. The findings from this study do not support the big-fish-little-pond hypothesis or the basking in reflected glory hypothesis. Differences between tracks for the development of self-concepts only became apparent after two years.