Peer Assisted Learning. Unravelling peer tutors' approaches to tutoring and their effects on students' learning, experiences and the dynamics of this learning environment

A lot is known about the effectiveness of peer assisted learning and peer tutoring. In contrast, process-oriented research remains relatively limited. Since different kinds of interactions promote different kinds oflearning (King, 1997), it is important to understand exactly how peer tutors tutor an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Berghmans, Inneke
Format: Dissertation
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A lot is known about the effectiveness of peer assisted learning and peer tutoring. In contrast, process-oriented research remains relatively limited. Since different kinds of interactions promote different kinds oflearning (King, 1997), it is important to understand exactly how peer tutors tutor and how their adopted strategies affect the learning opportunities generated within these learning environments. The need to disentangle peer tutors behavioural repertoire and its implications for students learning, experiences and the dynamics of the peer tutored learning environment raises as one considers that inexperienced or unskilled tutors, such as peers, have become the norm in tutoring settings nowadays. However, as peer tutors knowledge is often implicit, fragmented and poorly organised (Roscoe & Chi, 2007), and as it is known that they face the challenge of a double student-and-tutor role (Colvin, 2007), one can question whether and how peer tutors contribute to students learning. These reflections have stimulated this doctoral research project.In particular, this doctoral research project consisted of two empirical research phases. In a first phase (chapter 1), the behavioural strategies of peer tutors were investigated in-depth by means of a qualitative case study. Results showed that peer tutors engaged mainly in directive strategies, i.e.providing cut-and-dried answers or elaborations. Theseelaborations were, however, of a profound quality. In contrast, facilitative strategies (i.e.questioning, prompting or hinting) were less observed. What is more, they appeared to be rather general in nature. Furthermore, a typology of approaches to peer tutoring resulted from this study, i.e. motivational organisers, informers and questioners. Finally, it was shown that different types of peer tutors experienced tutoring differently.The second phase, represented by four empirical studies (chapters 2-5),built further on the results obtained in the first research phase. It aimed to investigate the effects of two different approaches to peer tutoring on students learning and experiences, as well to grasp the dynamics that resulted from both tutoring approaches in terms of students learning (inter-)actions adopted within the learning environment. For these purposes, a large-scale quasi-experimental study was set up in which two specific approaches to peer tutoring were induced, i.e. adirective versus facilitative approach. Chapter 2 and 3focused on the effects of the