The Usefulness of 18 F-FDG PET to Differentiate Subtypes of Dementia: The Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) in differen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dementia and neurocognitive disorders 2024, Vol.23 (1), p.54-66
Hauptverfasser: Seunghee Na, Dong Woo Kang, Geon Ha Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Yeshin Kim, Hee-Jin Kim, Kee Hyung Park, Young Ho Park, Gihwan Byeon, Jeewon Suh, Joon Hyun Shin, YongSoo Shim, YoungSoon Yang, Yoo Hyun Um, Seong-il Oh, Sheng-Min Wang, Bora Yoon, Hai-Jeon Yoon, Sun Min Lee, Juyoun Lee, Jin San Lee, Hak Young Rhee, Jae-Sung Lim, Young Hee Jung, Juhee Chin, Yun Jeong Hong, Hyemin Jang, Hongyoon Choi, Miyoung Choi, Jae-Won Jang, Korean Dementia Association
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer's dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the goldstandard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.
ISSN:1738-1495
2384-0757