네 가지 전동 Ni-Ti 파일의 danger zone에서의 근관성형력

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping abilities of four different rotary nickel-titanium instruments with anticurvature motion to prepare root canal at danger zone by measuring the change of dentin thickness in order to have techniques of safe preparation of canals with nickel-titanium files. Mesiobuccal and mesiolingual canals of forty mesial roots of extracted human lower molars were instrumented using the crown-down technique with ProFile, $GT^{TM}$ Rotary file, Quantec file and $ProTaper^{TM}$. In each root, one canal was prepared with a straight up-and-down motion and the other canal was with an anticurvature motion. Canals were instrumented until apical foramens were up to size of 30 by one operator. The muffle system was used to evaluate the root canal preparation. After superimposing the pre- and post-instrumentation canal. change in root dentin thickness was measured at the inner and outer sides of the canal at 1. 3, and 5 mm levels from the furcation. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Root dentin thickness at danger zone was significantly thinner than that at safe zone at all levels (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the change of root dentin thickness between the straight up-and-down and the anticurvature motions at both danger and safe zones in all groups (p > 0.05). ProTaper removed significantly more dentin than other files especially at furcal 3 mm level of danger and safe zones (p < 0.05) Therefore, it was concluded that anticurvature motion with nickel-titanium rotary instruments does not seem to be effective in danger zone of lower molars. 하악 대구치 근심치근의 danger zone에서 수종의 전동 니켈-티타늄 파일의 근관성형력을 근관성형 전후 치질 두께의 변화를 측정하여 평가하고자 하였다. 기구에 따라 총 40개의 하악 대구치를 10개씩 $Profile^{\circledR}$, GT Rotary file, Quantec 및 ProTaper 4개 군으로 나누고 각 치아당 2개의 근관을 straight up-and-down과 anticurvature 군으로 나누어 근단부 근관을 모두 30번 크기로 일정하게 확대하였다. 수정된 Bramante법을 사용하였으며 술전 및 술후의 근관 상아질 두께를 치수저 하방 1, 3 및 5 mm지점에서 측정, 이원변량분석법으로 통계분석하였다. 모든 군의 danger zone과 safe zone에서의 straight up-and-down 동작과 anticurvature 동작 사이에는 치근상아질 두께변화에 현저한 차이를 나타내지 않았다 (p > 0.05). ProTaper는 danger zone과 safe zone 모두에서 다른 기구에 비해 많은 량의 근관상아질 삭제를 보였으며 특히 분지부 3 mm 수준에서 현저하였다(p < 0.05).