비체외순환 및 체외순환하에서의 관상동맥우회로술의 임상 고찰

With the developement of non-invasive surgical techeniques, coronary artery bypass graft without cardiopulmonary bypass has become popular. We compared the preoperative risk factors and in-hospital outcomes of patients having off-pump CABG with these having on-pump CABG. Material and Method： From January 2001 to June 2003, 87 patients underwent CABG. Thirty-sin patients underwent on-pump CABG, fifty-one patients under-went off-pump CABG. Preoperative risk factors, extent of coronary disease, operative time, postoperative endotracheal intubation time, duration of ICU stay & hospital stay, the amount of bleeding and postoperative levels of cardiac enzymes were compared in both groups, Result: The were no differences in their sex ratios, ages, preoperative risk factors, preoperative Ml, Canadian classes, extent of coronary artery diseases and, echocardio-graphic ejection fraction between Off-pump CABG and On-pump CABG groups. Off-pump CABG group had significantly lower mean operative time (270$\pm$79.3 min vs 372$\pm$142.2 min, p＜0.001), mean ventilation time (17.1$\pm$13.4 hr vs 24.3$\pm$17.8 hr) and CK-MB level (8,9$\pm$18.7 IU/L vs 25.7$\pm$8.4 IU/L) than on-pump CABG groups, On-pump CABG group had more distal grafts (2.2$\pm$0.5 vs 1.7$\pm$0.71 than Off-pump CABG groups did. There were no differences in their postoperative complications and outcomes including amount of postoperative bleeding for 24 hrs, reoperation for bleeding control, mean in-hospital days, postoperative infection, renal failure and neurologic complications between Off-pump CABG and On-pump CABG groups. Conclusion: This study showed that patients who underwent Off-pump CABG had less operation time & intubation time and lower CK-MB level; however, they also have less distal graft. Even though CABG without CPB provided satisfactory results, more clinical experience & longer follow-up is required. 최근 비침습적인 수술방법이 발전하면서 체외순환 없이 시행하는 관상동맥우회로술에 대한 관심이 증가하게 되었으며 체외순환의 여러가지 부작용들이 발표되면서 비체외순환하의 수술이 점차로 보편화되어 본원에서 시행한 비체외순환 및 체외순환하에서의 관상동맥우회로술의 성적을 비교 분석하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2001년 1월부터 2003년 6월까지 관상동맥우회로술을 시행 받았던 87명의 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 체외순환하 관상동맥우회로술 36예, 비체외순환하 관상동맥우회로술 51예를 시행하였으며 양군에서 수술 전 위험인자와 관상동맥 질환정도, 평균수술시간, 술 후 삽관기간, 평균 중환자실 재원기간, 평균 재원기간, 술 후 강심제의 사용, 술 후 출혈량, 술 후 심근효소치를 비교 분석하였다. 결과: 두 군 의 남녀비, 연령, 술 전 위험요소에 대한 통계적 유의성은 없었으며 심근경색 기왕력, 흉통의 정도(Canadian Class), 관상동맥 질환의 정도 및 심박출 계수도 통계적인 차이를 보이지 않았다. 평균 수술시간은 체외순환하 수술군에서 372 $\pm$ 142.2분, 비체외순환하 수술군에서 270 $\pm$ 79.3분으로 비체외순환하 수술군에서 유의한 차이를 보였다(p < 0.