Is the Impedance Baseline Helpful in the Evaluation of Globus Patients?

Background/Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been suggested to be responsible for 23-68% of globus cases. The impedance baseline (IB) acquired by 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring has been proven to represent esophageal mucosal integrity. We aimed to investigate w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility 2015-07, Vol.21 (3), p.390
Hauptverfasser: Yeon Joo Chun, Myung Gyu Choi, Hyung Hun Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Aekyeong Ku
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been suggested to be responsible for 23-68% of globus cases. The impedance baseline (IB) acquired by 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring has been proven to represent esophageal mucosal integrity. We aimed to investigate whether the IB is helpful for evaluating globus patients. Methods: Twenty-four-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance pH tracings (MII-pH) were evaluated in globus patients. Differences in the IB between the acid reflux, non-acid reflux, and no reflux groups were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained to determine the optimal measurement point from the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Results: A total of 62 patients were analyzed. MII-pH showed that acid reflux, non-acid reflux, and no reflux were present in 13, 5, and 44 patients, respectively. The acid reflux group had a significantly lower IB than the other groups at a location 3 cm from the LES. ROC curve analysis revealed that placement at a position 3 cm from the LES resulted in moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.88). When we set 2500 Ω as the cut-off value for acid reflux at a position 3 cm from the LES, the additional diagnostic yield for acid reflux was increased by 19.4% compared with that obtained by MII-pH. Conclusions: IB is complementary to pH findings enabling identification of a subset of patients with co-existing acid reflux. Catheter placement at a location 3 cm from the LES and a cut-off value of 2500 Ω may be reasonable criteria for estimating acid reflux. (J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;21:390-397)
ISSN:2093-0879
2093-0887