위암에서의 진단 방법들의 유용성 평가 : 수술 전후의 병기 결정의 비교

Backgroud: Gastric cancer remains the main cause of cancer-related death in Korea. Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer is essential to predict prognosis and to plan optimal treatment. Although there are many reports dealing with the diagnostic values of conventional methods, controversie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Korean journal of medicine 1997-08, Vol.53 (2), p.225
Hauptverfasser: 최재홍, Jae Hong Choi, 나병규, Byung Kyu Na, 오상우, Sang Woo Oh, 이지현, Jee Hyun Lee, 정상무, Sang Moo Jung, 박선미, Seon Mee Park, 윤세진, Sae Jin Yun, 김승택, Sung Taek Kim, 이복희, Pok Hee Lee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Backgroud: Gastric cancer remains the main cause of cancer-related death in Korea. Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer is essential to predict prognosis and to plan optimal treatment. Although there are many reports dealing with the diagnostic values of conventional methods, controversies are still present especially in the field of preoperative staging. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of gastroscopy and upper gastrointestinal series(UGI) for diagnosis of gastric cancer, and determined the usefulness of ultrasonography and computed tomography for preoperative staging. Methods : One hundred twenty-three patients, who underwent operation from Aug. 1991 to Mar. 1995 under the diagnosis of gastric cancer were analyzed. We excluded 15 patients because their postoperative definitive stagings were undetemined. Results : 1) Among 123 patients, the proportion of early gastric cancer was 26.0%(32/123) and that of the advanced gastric cancer was 74.0%(91/123). 2) The sensitivity of endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer was 96.7%(119/123), and the accuracy to determine the depth of invasion was 82.9% (102/123). 3) The sensitivity of UGI study for gastric cancer was 89.9%(98/109), and the accuracy to determine the depth of invasion was 61.5%(61/109). 4) The sensitivity of abdominal ultrasonography to detect the tumor was 11.3%(8/71), the accuracy to determine the T stage was 29.2%(28/96), and the sensitivity and specificity to detect lymph node metastasis was 13.6%(8/59), 100%(37/37), respectively. 5) The sensitivity of abdominal CT to detect the tumor was 74.3%(26/35), the accuracy to determine the T stage was 32.5%(13/40), and the sensitivity and specificity to detect lymph node metastasis were 34.5%(9/29), 72.7%(8/11), respectively. 6) The accuracy of preoperative staging was 45.5%(56/123). The 49.6%(62/123) of gastric cancer was downstaged, whereas only 4.1%(5/123) was overstaged. Conclusion: Our results show that high accuracy for diagnosis of gastrie cancer with the gastroscopy and UGI. However preoperative staging with ultrasonography and computed tomograpy was often underestimated, which could be concluded that the usefulness of the radiologic methods was limited.
ISSN:1738-9364