간외 담관암에서 경유듀 조직생검과 담즙세포진 병합검사의 유용성

Background/Aims: In the management of patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, histologic diagnosis is crucial to determine therapeutic modalities, to predict their outcomes, and to avoid an unnecessary operation. Though various methods were developed, none of them yielded satisfactory results. A combination of those methods was reported to yield superior sensitivity and specificity to a single method. To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, endoscopic transpapillary biopsy (ETPB) and exfoliative bile aspiration cytology (BAC) was performed in 40 patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Methods: After visualization of the biliary tree and the lesion by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), ETPB (n=40) and BAC (n=28) was done in one session with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and the results of two methods were analyzed. Results: The final diagnoses were made by surgical pathology and by clinical follow-ups of more than a year. The locations of the 40 bile duct carcinomas were in the upper area in 25, the middle in 14 and the lower in 1. ETPB was performed in all patients and BAC in 28 patients. The overall sensitivity of the ETPB was 65.0% (26/40). According to the morphology and location, the sensitivity of ETPB was 65.6% (11/32) for sclerotic, 60.0% (3/5) for papillary, and 66.7% (2/3) for the protruding type, and 68.0% (17/25) for the upper bile duct lesion, 64.3% (9/14) for the middle, and 0% (0/1) for the lower. The overall sensitivity of the BAC was 71.4% (20/28). According to the morphology and location, the sensitivity of BAC was 80.0% (16/20) for sclerotic, 20% (1/5) for papillary, and 100% (3/3) for the protruding type, and 82.4% (14/17) for the upper bile duct lesion and 54.5% (6/11) for the middle bile duct lesion. When the two tests were combined, the sensitivity rose to 96.4% (27/28). Conclusions: A combination of ETPB and BAC is useful in making a histologic diagnosis in patients with bile duct carcinoma. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 19: 588∼596, 1999)