Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Preliminary Trial

Introduction: Individualized homeopathy (IH) in atopic dermatitis (AD) remained under-researched. Objective: We aimed at evaluating efficacy of IH in AD. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, short-term, preliminary trial was conducted in an Indian homeopathy hospital. Patients we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Complementary medicine research 2022-01, Vol.29 (1), p.17-26
Hauptverfasser: Dey, Samit, Shaikh, Abdur Rahaman, Saha, Sangita, Agrawal, Ekta, Gautam, Ashish Kumar, Karuppusamy, Avaranjika, Sadhukhan, Satarupa, Dutta, Souvik, Ali, Sk. Swaif, Basu, Anamika, Koley, Munmun, Saha, Subhranil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: Individualized homeopathy (IH) in atopic dermatitis (AD) remained under-researched. Objective: We aimed at evaluating efficacy of IH in AD. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, short-term, preliminary trial was conducted in an Indian homeopathy hospital. Patients were randomized to either IH (n = 30) or identical-looking placebo (n = 30) using computerized randomization and allocation. Outcomes were patient-oriented scoring of AD (PO-SCORAD; primary end point), Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, and AD burden score for adults (ADBSA; secondary end points), measured monthly for 3 months. An intention-to-treat sample was analyzed after adjusting baseline differences. Results: On PO-SCORAD, improvement was higher in IH against placebo, but nonsignificant statistically (p month 1 = 0.433, p month 2 = 0.442, p month 3 = 0.229). Secondary outcomes were also nonsignificant – both DLQI and ADBSA (p > 0.05). Four adverse events (diarrhea, injury, common cold) were recorded. Conclusions: There was a small, but nonsignificant direction of effect towards homeopathy, which renders the trial inconclusive. A properly powered robust trial is indicated.
ISSN:2504-2092
2504-2106
DOI:10.1159/000516026