Efficacy of Vinorelbine Monotherapy as Third- or Further-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background: The survival rate of patients with lung cancer has increased significantly over the years, but there has been no further progress in third- or fourth-line therapy. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with weekly vinorelbine, a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid, in ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oncology 2019-12, Vol.97 (6), p.356-364
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Da Hyun, Kim, Ju Ock, Jung, Sung Soo, Park, Hee Sun, Chung, Chaeuk, Park, Dongil, Lee, Jeong Eun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The survival rate of patients with lung cancer has increased significantly over the years, but there has been no further progress in third- or fourth-line therapy. We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with weekly vinorelbine, a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had previously been treated several times. Methods: In all, 159 NSCLC patients who received vinorelbine monotherapy as third- or further-line therapy between January 2008 and July 2017 were included in this study. Patients received vinorelbine intravenously at a dose of 25–30 mg/m 2 /week. Results: Their mean age was 62.4 years. The histologic types of tumor were adenocarcinoma (50.9%), squamous cell carcinoma (42.8%), and others (6.2%). The overall response rate was 19.5% (31/159). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5–3.5 months), and the median overall survival (OS) after vinorelbine use was 7.6 months (95% CI 6.2–9.0 months). Vinorelbine therapy showed significantly higher efficacy in patients with adenocarcinoma, and these patients had a longer PFS than patients with other types of cancer. Patients who received vinorelbine as fifth- or further-line treatment had a higher response rate and longer PFS and OS than those who received vinorelbine as third- or fourth-line treatment. Conclusions: Weekly vinorelbine monotherapy may be a feasible therapeutic option for patients with heavily treated, advanced NSCLC, particularly lung adenocarcinoma.
ISSN:0030-2414
1423-0232
DOI:10.1159/000502343