A Direct Bootstrap Method for Complex Sampling Designs From a Finite Population

In complex designs, classical bootstrap methods result in a biased variance estimator when the sampling design is not taken into account. Resampled units are usually rescaled or weighted in order to achieve unbiasedness in the linear case. In the present article, we propose novel resampling methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Statistical Association 2011-06, Vol.106 (494), p.534-543
Hauptverfasser: Antal, Erika, Tillé, Yves
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In complex designs, classical bootstrap methods result in a biased variance estimator when the sampling design is not taken into account. Resampled units are usually rescaled or weighted in order to achieve unbiasedness in the linear case. In the present article, we propose novel resampling methods that may be directly applied to variance estimation. These methods consist of selecting subsamples under a completely different sampling scheme from that which generated the original sample, which is composed of several sampling designs. In particular, a portion of the subsampled units is selected without replacement, while another is selected with replacement, thereby adjusting for the finite population setting. We show that these bootstrap estimators directly and precisely reproduce unbiased estimators of the variance in the linear case in a time-efficient manner, and eliminate the need for classical adjustment methods such as rescaling, correction factors, or artificial populations. Moreover, we show via simulation studies that our method is at least as efficient as those currently existing, which call for additional adjustment. This methodology can be applied to classical sampling designs, including simple random sampling with and without replacement, Poisson sampling, and unequal probability sampling with and without replacement.
ISSN:0162-1459
1537-274X
DOI:10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09767