"Social vs. Military Spending": A Different Perspective

There are three problems with Ismael Hossein-zadeh's "Social vs. Military Spending" in the June 2009 Review of Social Economy in which he sets out to demonstrate the consequences of "escalating US military spending at the expense of non-military public spending." First, ther...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of social economy 2010-06, Vol.68 (2), p.205-219
1. Verfasser: Edward, O'Boyle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There are three problems with Ismael Hossein-zadeh's "Social vs. Military Spending" in the June 2009 Review of Social Economy in which he sets out to demonstrate the consequences of "escalating US military spending at the expense of non-military public spending." First, there is abundant evidence indicating that non-military public spending has not been sacrificed to satisfy the demands of the military establishment. Second, the very same tax cuts for the rich that increased income equality are associated with huge increases in taxes collected from the rich. Third, Hurricane Katrina provides little support for his hypothesis that military spending led to infrastructure neglect.
ISSN:0034-6764
1470-1162
DOI:10.1080/00346760903480921