C is for Cookie: Is the EU’s New “Cookie Law” Good Enough to Protect My Data?

[...]data breaches have consistently increased in recent years, with almost 1,300 breaches in 2017 and over 600 as of July 24, 2018.11 This is obviously a problem that affects millions of people across the globe each year and is expected to continually increase as the global economy becomes ever mor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International lawyer 2019, Vol.52 (3), p.491-514
1. Verfasser: Meyers, William A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[...]data breaches have consistently increased in recent years, with almost 1,300 breaches in 2017 and over 600 as of July 24, 2018.11 This is obviously a problem that affects millions of people across the globe each year and is expected to continually increase as the global economy becomes ever more digital, forcing some to call for action. [...]the comment will speculate as to any potential legal developments as a result of the GDPR's implementation in the European Union and ways that it may evolve over time to affect not only the European Union but also other nations that do business in the European Union and those nations around the globe who have or are considering implementing data protection regulations similar to the GDPR, including the United States. "21 Part of the Federal Constitutional Court's reasoning is the fact that it is now easier than ever to acquire information and exert influence over another using that information and the psychological stresses that can accompany that kind of public awareness.22 The court goes on to worry about a societal structure in which a citizen is unaware of who knows what about him/her, when they knew it, and why they knew it.23 The court then states that "the individual must be protected from the unlimited collection, storage, use, and transmission of personal data as a condition for free personality development under modern conditions of data processing" and that the individual, not the state or some other power, has the right to determine if another party may use or divulge his personal data.24 The Federal Constitutional Court does recognize there is a limit to this "informational self-determination," noting that the individual is a personality within a society and public interest may prevail over the rights of the individual in some cases (examples would be public safety or if an individual is missing).25 According to Bradford, this case and the informational "self-determination" became the bedrock upon which the EU's views on privacy and data have been built.26 These laws and this decision by the German Federal Constitutional Court set the stage for incredibly forward-thinking data privacy laws as the world becomes more and more digital. "31 In this case, the court ruled that Google must abide by the wishes of users to take down or delete any data they had acquired that appeared to be irrelevant, inadequate, or no longer adequate to their business interests.32 Since that decision, as of May 2018, Google ha
ISSN:0020-7810
2169-6578