TENURE AND PROMOTION DECISIONS: THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP, AND SERVICE
Research about the relative importance of faculty performance of teaching, scholarship, and service work roles in tenure and promotion decisions is reviewed and updated. Data collected from 130 deans or directors through Internet administration of the Work Role Salience Index (Green & Baskind, 2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of social work education 2008-04, Vol.44 (2), p.117-128 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Research about the relative importance of faculty performance of teaching,
scholarship, and service work roles in tenure and promotion decisions is
reviewed and updated. Data collected from 130 deans or directors through
Internet administration of the Work Role Salience Index (Green & Baskind,
2007) suggested some variation in the weighting of tenure and promotion decisions
among different programs and among different types of programs.
However, scholarship was salient at a majority of institutions; teaching and
service roles have become less influential over time. Conflict between these
findings and findings about workload time allocated to scholarship, teaching,
and service are identified and implications discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1043-7797 2163-5811 |
DOI: | 10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700003 |