Advocate Scoring for Unbiased Information

Advocate Scoring for Unbiased Information

People often form opinions or make decisions after exposure to information provided by advocates. A continuing problem is the identification of procedures which lead to better balance in such information. Scoring of advocates through competition in statistically identical tasks is one approach to co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Statistical Association 1975-03, Vol.70 (349), p.15-22
1. Verfasser: Warner, Stanley L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Applications
Applied statistics
Estimation bias
Expressways
Information economics
Information resources
Least squares
Logarithms
Natural logarithms
Population estimates
Proportions
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 349
container_start_page 15
container_title Journal of the American Statistical Association
container_volume 70
creator Warner, Stanley L.
description People often form opinions or make decisions after exposure to information provided by advocates. A continuing problem is the identification of procedures which lead to better balance in such information. Scoring of advocates through competition in statistically identical tasks is one approach to control. Shannon's [7] concept of information in a Bayesian framework is used for illustrative estimation models, and an experiment involving public opinion in an expressway controversy provides an example.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480254
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_10_2307_2285369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2285369</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2285369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e705014594eab3893c3100dd297435360d4c5a4ae10cead4fbd68504b71349a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQp640XnyVeTXo7hx2DghQ68C2mSSsvWzKRT9u9NqQPvzE3I4XnzHh6ErjHMMEi4B1wQzHg5w6XgacQkEM5O0ARzKnIi2PspmgxQPlDn6CLGFtIRUk7Q3dx-eaN7l70aH5ruI6t9yNZd1ejobLbs0nOr-8Z3l-is1pvorn7vKVo_PrwtnvPVy9NyMV_lhuKiz50ADkMRc7qisqRpDGAtKQWjnBZgmeGaaYfBOG1ZXdlCcmCVwJSVuqRTdDP-uwv-c-9ir1q_D12qVJhiLEEQiRNVjJQJPsbgarULzVaHg8KgBi3qqEUNWtRRSwrejsE29j78TREKQhEi05LDFvMRa0YD3z5srOr1YeNDHXRnmqjoP1U_kVJyeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311807281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advocate Scoring for Unbiased Information</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><creator>Warner, Stanley L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Warner, Stanley L.</creatorcontrib><description>People often form opinions or make decisions after exposure to information provided by advocates. A continuing problem is the identification of procedures which lead to better balance in such information. Scoring of advocates through competition in statistically identical tasks is one approach to control. Shannon's [7] concept of information in a Bayesian framework is used for illustrative estimation models, and an experiment involving public opinion in an expressway controversy provides an example.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-274X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1975.10480254</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Applications ; Applied statistics ; Estimation bias ; Expressways ; Information economics ; Information resources ; Least squares ; Logarithms ; Natural logarithms ; Population estimates ; Proportions</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1975-03, Vol.70 (349), p.15-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 1975</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e705014594eab3893c3100dd297435360d4c5a4ae10cead4fbd68504b71349a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e705014594eab3893c3100dd297435360d4c5a4ae10cead4fbd68504b71349a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2285369$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2285369$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,828,27848,27903,27904,57995,57999,58228,58232</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warner, Stanley L.</creatorcontrib><title>Advocate Scoring for Unbiased Information</title><title>Journal of the American Statistical Association</title><description>People often form opinions or make decisions after exposure to information provided by advocates. A continuing problem is the identification of procedures which lead to better balance in such information. Scoring of advocates through competition in statistically identical tasks is one approach to control. Shannon's [7] concept of information in a Bayesian framework is used for illustrative estimation models, and an experiment involving public opinion in an expressway controversy provides an example.</description><subject>Applications</subject><subject>Applied statistics</subject><subject>Estimation bias</subject><subject>Expressways</subject><subject>Information economics</subject><subject>Information resources</subject><subject>Least squares</subject><subject>Logarithms</subject><subject>Natural logarithms</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Proportions</subject><issn>0162-1459</issn><issn>1537-274X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1975</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQp640XnyVeTXo7hx2DghQ68C2mSSsvWzKRT9u9NqQPvzE3I4XnzHh6ErjHMMEi4B1wQzHg5w6XgacQkEM5O0ARzKnIi2PspmgxQPlDn6CLGFtIRUk7Q3dx-eaN7l70aH5ruI6t9yNZd1ejobLbs0nOr-8Z3l-is1pvorn7vKVo_PrwtnvPVy9NyMV_lhuKiz50ADkMRc7qisqRpDGAtKQWjnBZgmeGaaYfBOG1ZXdlCcmCVwJSVuqRTdDP-uwv-c-9ir1q_D12qVJhiLEEQiRNVjJQJPsbgarULzVaHg8KgBi3qqEUNWtRRSwrejsE29j78TREKQhEi05LDFvMRa0YD3z5srOr1YeNDHXRnmqjoP1U_kVJyeg</recordid><startdate>19750301</startdate><enddate>19750301</enddate><creator>Warner, Stanley L.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>American Statistical Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19750301</creationdate><title>Advocate Scoring for Unbiased Information</title><author>Warner, Stanley L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-e705014594eab3893c3100dd297435360d4c5a4ae10cead4fbd68504b71349a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1975</creationdate><topic>Applications</topic><topic>Applied statistics</topic><topic>Estimation bias</topic><topic>Expressways</topic><topic>Information economics</topic><topic>Information resources</topic><topic>Least squares</topic><topic>Logarithms</topic><topic>Natural logarithms</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Proportions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warner, Stanley L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Statistical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warner, Stanley L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advocate Scoring for Unbiased Information</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Statistical Association</jtitle><date>1975-03-01</date><risdate>1975</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>349</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>15-22</pages><issn>0162-1459</issn><eissn>1537-274X</eissn><abstract>People often form opinions or make decisions after exposure to information provided by advocates. A continuing problem is the identification of procedures which lead to better balance in such information. Scoring of advocates through competition in statistically identical tasks is one approach to control. Shannon's [7] concept of information in a Bayesian framework is used for illustrative estimation models, and an experiment involving public opinion in an expressway controversy provides an example.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/01621459.1975.10480254</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-1459
ispartof Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1975-03, Vol.70 (349), p.15-22
issn 0162-1459
1537-274X
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_10_2307_2285369
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics
subjects Applications
Applied statistics
Estimation bias
Expressways
Information economics
Information resources
Least squares
Logarithms
Natural logarithms
Population estimates
Proportions
title Advocate Scoring for Unbiased Information
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A30%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advocate%20Scoring%20for%20Unbiased%20Information&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Statistical%20Association&rft.au=Warner,%20Stanley%20L.&rft.date=1975-03-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=349&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=15-22&rft.issn=0162-1459&rft.eissn=1537-274X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01621459.1975.10480254&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2285369%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311807281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2285369&rfr_iscdi=true