How Does it End?: Reflections on Completed Prosecutions under Australia′s Anti-Terrorism Legislation
Much has been written, both in this collection of essays and elsewhere, about the overbreadth of the terrorism offences contained in Part 5.3¹ of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (′Criminal Code′).² Likewise, the unwieldy nature and conceptual complexity of the definition of ′terrorist act′ upon whi...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Much has been written, both in this collection of essays and elsewhere, about the overbreadth of the terrorism offences contained in Part 5.3¹ of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (′Criminal Code′).² Likewise, the unwieldy nature and conceptual complexity of the definition of ′terrorist act′ upon which most of the terrorism offences depend has received significant criticism.³ Whilst academic commentary based on the text of both the offences and the definition has abounded, given the few actual prosecutions in this country,⁴ there has necessarily been less scrutiny of how those offences have been dealt with in specific cases.
As at |
---|