A World of Insecurity: Democratic Disenchantment in Rich and Poor Countries
An ambitious account of the corrosion of liberal democracy in rich and poor countries alike, arguing that antidemocratic sentiment reflects fear of material and cultural loss, not a critique of liberalism's failure to deliver equality, and suggesting possible ways out. The retreat of liberal de...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | An ambitious account of the corrosion of liberal
democracy in rich and poor countries alike, arguing that
antidemocratic sentiment reflects fear of material and cultural
loss, not a critique of liberalism's failure to deliver equality,
and suggesting possible ways out. The retreat of liberal
democracy in the twenty-first century has been impossible to
ignore. From Wisconsin to Warsaw, Budapest to Bangalore, the public
is turning against pluralism and liberal institutions and instead
professing unapologetic nationalism and majoritarianism. Critics of
inequality argue that this is a predictable response to failures of
capitalism and liberalism, but Pranab Bardhan, a development
economist, sees things differently. The problem is not inequality
but insecurity-financial and cultural. Bardhan notes that
antidemocratic movements have taken root globally in a wide range
of demographic and socioeconomic groups. In the United States,
older, less-educated, rural populations have withdrawn from
democracy. But in India, the prevailing Hindu Nationalists enjoy
the support of educated, aspirational urban youth. And in Europe,
antidemocratic populists firmly back the welfare state (but for
nonimmigrants). What is consistent among antidemocrats is fear of
losing what they have. That could be money but is most often
national pride and culture and the comfort of tradition. A
World of Insecurity argues for context-sensitive responses.
Some, like universal basic income schemes, are better suited to
poor countries. Others, like worker empowerment and international
coordination, have broader appeal. But improving material security
won't be enough to sustain democracy. Nor, Bardhan writes, should
we be tempted by the ultimately hollow lure of China's
authoritarian model. He urges liberals to adopt at least a grudging
respect for fellow citizens' local attachments. By affirming civic
forms of community pride, we might hope to temper cultural
anxieties before they become pathological. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.2307/j.ctv2zfjdj5 |