Tell your clients you might hurt them: Negligence, consent, and contemporary psychological practice

Two cases of medical negligence were brought before the High Court during the 1990s. The resulting judgments altered the pre‐existing law of negligence and imposed new duties on all health professionals, including psychologists. Subsequent legislative changes have incorporated these High Court judgm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian psychologist 2006-11, Vol.41 (3), p.160-167
Hauptverfasser: O'BRIEN-MALONE, ANGELA, DIAMOND, MARK R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two cases of medical negligence were brought before the High Court during the 1990s. The resulting judgments altered the pre‐existing law of negligence and imposed new duties on all health professionals, including psychologists. Subsequent legislative changes have incorporated these High Court judgments and reaffirmed the duty that psychologists have to inform their clients of the (frequently unrecognised) risks of treatment. These same changes allow the possibility of psychologists being sued if they engage in forms of practice that are not logically defensible. We describe the historical context of the law of medical negligence and consider the ramifications that the recent legal changes have for psychologists.
ISSN:0005-0067
1742-9544
DOI:10.1080/00050060600776366