An Administrative Remedy for the Crack Mandatory Sentencing Problem

Abstract Current Federal laws over-punish minor crack dealers. A legislative fix for the problem has proven politically infeasible. Drug, form, and quantity, which form the basis of the existing sentencing schema, are relatively poor proxies of the dangerousness of the offender or the harm created b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Drug Policy Analysis 2008-10, Vol.1 (1), p.3
1. Verfasser: Kleiman, Mark A. R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Current Federal laws over-punish minor crack dealers. A legislative fix for the problem has proven politically infeasible. Drug, form, and quantity, which form the basis of the existing sentencing schema, are relatively poor proxies of the dangerousness of the offender or the harm created by the conduct-pattern underlying the case. An administrative requirement that low-level crack prosecutions be approved centrally could ensure that the five-years-for-five-grams mandatory sentence is not over-used, while keeping that sentence available for the relatively rare cases (e.g., as part of crackdowns on gang violence) in which it is justified. Recommended Citation Kleiman, Mark A. R. (2008) "An Administrative Remedy for the Crack Mandatory Sentencing Problem," Journal of Drug Policy Analysis: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1, Article 3. DOI: 10.2202/1941-2851.1003 Available at: http://www.bepress.com/jdpa/vol1/iss1/art3
ISSN:1941-2851
1941-2851
DOI:10.2202/1941-2851.1003