An Administrative Remedy for the Crack Mandatory Sentencing Problem
Abstract Current Federal laws over-punish minor crack dealers. A legislative fix for the problem has proven politically infeasible. Drug, form, and quantity, which form the basis of the existing sentencing schema, are relatively poor proxies of the dangerousness of the offender or the harm created b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Drug Policy Analysis 2008-10, Vol.1 (1), p.3 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Current Federal laws over-punish minor crack dealers. A legislative fix for the problem has proven politically infeasible. Drug, form, and quantity, which form the basis of the existing sentencing schema, are relatively poor proxies of the dangerousness of the offender or the harm created by the conduct-pattern underlying the case. An administrative requirement that low-level crack prosecutions be approved centrally could ensure that the five-years-for-five-grams mandatory sentence is not over-used, while keeping that sentence available for the relatively rare cases (e.g., as part of crackdowns on gang violence) in which it is justified.
Recommended Citation
Kleiman, Mark A. R.
(2008)
"An Administrative Remedy for the Crack Mandatory Sentencing Problem,"
Journal of Drug Policy Analysis:
Vol. 1
:
Iss.
1, Article 3.
DOI: 10.2202/1941-2851.1003
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/jdpa/vol1/iss1/art3 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1941-2851 1941-2851 |
DOI: | 10.2202/1941-2851.1003 |