Effect of prophylactic ganciclovir on cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most frequent infectious complication observed in renal transplant recipients and induces a significant morbidity in these patients due to CMV disease itself and to associated renal dysfunction or opportunistic superinfection. In order to evaluate the effect of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 1993, Vol.8 (9), p.858-862
Hauptverfasser: Rondeau, E., Bourgeon, B., Peraldi, M. N., Lang, Ph, Buisson, C., Schulte, K. M., Weill, B., Sraer, J. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most frequent infectious complication observed in renal transplant recipients and induces a significant morbidity in these patients due to CMV disease itself and to associated renal dysfunction or opportunistic superinfection. In order to evaluate the effect of ganciclovir prophylaxis we conducted an open-label prospective randomized study of ganciclovir administration in CMV seronegative recipients of a renal allograft from CMV seropositive donors. Ganciclovir (5 mg/kg b.i.d./day for 14 days) was started on day 14 after transplantation. Thirty-two patients were included in this study (15 in the control group, 17 in the ganciclovir group). There was no significant difference between the two groups for age, immunosuppressive regimen, number of rejection, steroid pulses, and OKT3 treatments. Renal and patient outcomes were similar in both groups. The rate of CMV infection and CMV disease were similar in both groups (80% and 73.3% in the control group versus 70.6% and 47.1% in the ganciclovir group; P=NS). Less severe CMV disease was observed in the ganciclovir group compared to controls. The delay between transplantation and CMV infection was significantly longer in the ganciclovir group compared to control group (68.1±5.1 versus 44.0±5.2 days, P
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a092610