A randomized placebo-controlled study of enalapril in the treatment of erythrocytosis after renal transplantation
Background Erythrocytosis is a common complication of renal transplantation with an incidence of up to 17%. It is associated with an increased risk of complications due to thromboembolic events and has traditionally been treated by intermittent venesection. More recently, angiotensin-converting enzy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 1995-12, Vol.10 (12), p.2316-2320 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background Erythrocytosis is a common complication of renal transplantation with an incidence of up to 17%. It is associated with an increased risk of complications due to thromboembolic events and has traditionally been treated by intermittent venesection. More recently, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to cause a fall in haematocrit in a number of groups of subjects and some uncontrolled studies have shown these drugs to be of possible therapeutic benefit in post renal transplant erythrocytosis. Methods We performed a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study in 25 patients with post-transplant erythrocytosis. Subjects received either 2.5 mg of enalapril daily or a placebo for 4 months and all patients completed the study period without any serious adverse effects. Results Haematocrit fell from 52.7 (±SEM 0.7) to 47.1 (± 1.8) at 1 month and 46.1 (± 1.2) after 4 months in patients receiving enalapril, with no change in the placebo group (P=0.004). We did not demonstrate any change in serum erythropoietin in either group. Conclusion Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are a safe and effective form of treatment for erythrocytosis developing after renal transplantation. The mechanism of action, however, is not mediated by changes in erythropoietin production and remains uncertain. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0931-0509 1460-2385 |
DOI: | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a091009 |