Treatment of aluminium intoxication: a new scheme for desferrioxamine administration

In order to control aluminium toxicity in dialysis patients it is preferable to prevent or limit exposure to it. However, it is sometimes necessary to remove the aluminium by the use of appropriate techniques. The collateral effects of desferrioxamine have led us to test new forms of administering d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 1994, Vol.9 (10), p.1431-1434
Hauptverfasser: Douthat, W. G., Acu≁a Aguerre, G., Fernández Martin, J. L., Mouzo, R., Cannata Andia, J. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In order to control aluminium toxicity in dialysis patients it is preferable to prevent or limit exposure to it. However, it is sometimes necessary to remove the aluminium by the use of appropriate techniques. The collateral effects of desferrioxamine have led us to test new forms of administering desferrioxamine and attempt to reduce the dose. The aim of this study was to compare the removal of aluminium by administration of 15 mg/kg of desferrioxamine under two different schemes, that is, 44 h before the dialysis (classic scheme) and 1 h before dialysis (new scheme). The study was carried out in 10 patients over a period of 4 weeks. Aluminium removal was quantified in the dialysate throughout the dialysis. Measurement was also performed of the serum aluminium changes that occurred during the study. The total removal of aluminium was determined over three consecutive dialysis sessions following the administration of desferrioxamine. A similar amount of aluminium was found under both schemes. However, in the case of those patients given desferriox amine 1 h prior to dialysis, removal of aluminium induced significantly lower serum aluminium peaks: (P
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a092668