Managing consumer complaints: differences and similarities among heterogeneous retailers
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is threefold: to examine complaint management among retailers in order to develop a typology of their strategic complaint management system; to develop a profile of each retailer group included in the typology using a set of key relevant variables (e.g. company si...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of retail & distribution management 2010-02, Vol.38 (1), p.6-23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is threefold: to examine complaint management among retailers in order to develop a typology of their strategic complaint management system; to develop a profile of each retailer group included in the typology using a set of key relevant variables (e.g. company size, perceived customer dissatisfaction); and to investigate the state of complaint management across different types of retailers.Design methodology approach - Data are collected from an online survey of Danish and Swedish grocery retailers, electronic stores, car-dealers, and furniture stores (n=260) using self-administered questionnaires.Findings - Cluster analysis identifies two clusters of retailers: non-active complaint handlers and medium-active complaint handlers. Medium-active complaint handlers regard complaint handling as having higher strategic relevance than non-active complaint handlers and also, medium-active complaint handlers were more inclined to compensate the complaining customers for the loss they might have experienced. The developed cluster profiles revealed that medium-active complaint handlers perceive a higher degree of customer dissatisfaction than do non-active complaint handlers and also that a larger proportion of their customers have complained. Within retailers, grocery stores had the best compensation policies and the most positive attitude toward retailer-customer interaction, while car dealers are the most likely to have a strategic plan to deal with complaints.Practical implications - The results obtained in this paper indicate that retailers hesitate from inciting customers to complain. This is unfortunate, as dissatisfied customers should be regarded as a strategic asset, which potentially could provide retailers with important knowledge concerning their products and services and thereby helping retailers in improving their market place behaviour.Originality value - No other research has looked across different types of retailers to determine if there are differences in the integration of complaints to the strategic management process. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-0552 1758-6690 |
DOI: | 10.1108/09590551011016304 |