Managing consumer complaints: differences and similarities among heterogeneous retailers

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is threefold: to examine complaint management among retailers in order to develop a typology of their strategic complaint management system; to develop a profile of each retailer group included in the typology using a set of key relevant variables (e.g. company si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of retail & distribution management 2010-02, Vol.38 (1), p.6-23
Hauptverfasser: Hansen, Torben, Wilke, Ricky, Zaichkowsky, Judith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is threefold: to examine complaint management among retailers in order to develop a typology of their strategic complaint management system; to develop a profile of each retailer group included in the typology using a set of key relevant variables (e.g. company size, perceived customer dissatisfaction); and to investigate the state of complaint management across different types of retailers.Design methodology approach - Data are collected from an online survey of Danish and Swedish grocery retailers, electronic stores, car-dealers, and furniture stores (n=260) using self-administered questionnaires.Findings - Cluster analysis identifies two clusters of retailers: non-active complaint handlers and medium-active complaint handlers. Medium-active complaint handlers regard complaint handling as having higher strategic relevance than non-active complaint handlers and also, medium-active complaint handlers were more inclined to compensate the complaining customers for the loss they might have experienced. The developed cluster profiles revealed that medium-active complaint handlers perceive a higher degree of customer dissatisfaction than do non-active complaint handlers and also that a larger proportion of their customers have complained. Within retailers, grocery stores had the best compensation policies and the most positive attitude toward retailer-customer interaction, while car dealers are the most likely to have a strategic plan to deal with complaints.Practical implications - The results obtained in this paper indicate that retailers hesitate from inciting customers to complain. This is unfortunate, as dissatisfied customers should be regarded as a strategic asset, which potentially could provide retailers with important knowledge concerning their products and services and thereby helping retailers in improving their market place behaviour.Originality value - No other research has looked across different types of retailers to determine if there are differences in the integration of complaints to the strategic management process.
ISSN:0959-0552
1758-6690
DOI:10.1108/09590551011016304