Productlevel carbon auditing of supply chains
Purpose Interest in productlevel carbon auditing and labelling has been growing in both business and government circles. The purpose of this paper is to examine the practical problems and costs associated with highly disaggregated analyses of greenhouse gas emissions from supply chains. It then weig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of physical distribution & logistics management 2010-02, Vol.40 (1/2), p.42-60 |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose Interest in productlevel carbon auditing and labelling has been growing in both business and government circles. The purpose of this paper is to examine the practical problems and costs associated with highly disaggregated analyses of greenhouse gas emissions from supply chains. It then weighs these problems and costs against the potential benefits of the carbon labelling of products. Designmethodologyapproach The views expressed in this paper are based on a review of relevant literature, informal discussions with senior managers and personal experience with the practices being investigated. Findings Stockkeeping unitlevel carbon auditing of supply chains and the related carbon labelling of products will be fraught with difficulty and very costly. While simplification of the auditing process, the use of data inventories and software support may assist these processes, the practicality of applying them to all consumer products seems very doubtful. The resulting benefits to companies and consumers are also highly questionable. The main conclusion, therefore, is that productlevel carbon auditing and labelling is a wasteful distraction and that it would be better to devote management time and resources to other decarbonisation initiatives. Research limitationsimplications To date relatively few firms have carbon audited their supply chains at a product level and so industrial experience is limited. Market research on the likely behavioural response to carbon labelling is also at an early stage. There is sufficient evidence available, however, to conduct an initial critique of product level carbon auditing and labelling. Practical implications Some companies and government agencies should reconsider their plans for the carbon labelling of products. Originalityvalue This is the first paper in the logisticssupply chain literature to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new form of carbon footprinting and labelling. It is intended to stimulate debate among logistics academics and practitioners. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-0035 |
DOI: | 10.1108/09600031011018037 |