Does the Magnetic Field Suppress Fragmentation in Massive Dense Cores?
Theoretical and numerical works indicate that a strong magnetic field should suppress fragmentation in dense cores. However, this has never been tested observationally in a relatively large sample of fragmenting massive dense cores. Here, we use the polarization data obtained in the Submillimeter Ar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Astrophysical journal 2021-05, Vol.912 (2), p.159 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Theoretical and numerical works indicate that a strong magnetic field should suppress fragmentation in dense cores. However, this has never been tested observationally in a relatively large sample of fragmenting massive dense cores. Here, we use the polarization data obtained in the Submillimeter Array Legacy Survey of Zhang et al. to build a sample of 18 massive dense cores where both fragmentation and magnetic field properties are studied in a uniform way. We measured the fragmentation level,
N
mm
, within the field of view common to all regions of ∼0.15 pc, with a mass sensitivity of ∼0.5
M
☉
, and a spatial resolution of ∼1000 au. In order to obtain the magnetic field strength using the Davis–Chandrasekhar–Fermi method, we estimated the dispersion of the polarization position angles, the velocity dispersion of the H
13
CO
+
(4–3) gas, and the density of each core, all averaged within 0.15 pc. A strong correlation is found between
N
mm
and the average density of the parental core, although with significant scatter. When large-scale systematic motions are separated from the velocity dispersion and only the small-scale (turbulent) contribution is taken into account, a tentative correlation is found between
N
mm
and the mass-to-flux ratio, as suggested by numerical and theoretical works. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
DOI: | 10.3847/1538-4357/abee1e |