Convection-aided Explosions in One-dimensional Core-collapse Supernova Simulations. I. Technique and Validation

Most one-dimensional core-collapse simulations fail to explode, yet multidimensional simulations often explode. A dominant multidimensional effect aiding explosion is neutrino-driven convection. We incorporate a convection model in approximate one-dimensional core-collapse supernova (CCSN) simulatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2019-12, Vol.887 (1), p.43
Hauptverfasser: Mabanta, Quintin A., Murphy, Jeremiah W., Dolence, Joshua C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Most one-dimensional core-collapse simulations fail to explode, yet multidimensional simulations often explode. A dominant multidimensional effect aiding explosion is neutrino-driven convection. We incorporate a convection model in approximate one-dimensional core-collapse supernova (CCSN) simulations. This is the 1D+ method. This convection model lowers the neutrino luminosity required for explosion by %, similar to the reduction observed in multidimensional simulations. The model is based upon the global turbulence model of Mabanta & Murphy and models the mean-field turbulent flow of neutrino-driven convection. In this preliminary investigation, we use simple neutrino heating and cooling algorithms to compare the critical condition in the 1D+ simulations with the critical condition observed in two-dimensional simulations. Qualitatively, the critical conditions in the 1D+ and the two-dimensional simulations are similar. The assumptions in the convection model affect the radial profiles of density, entropy, and temperature, and comparisons with the profiles of three-dimensional simulations will help to calibrate these assumptions. These 1D+ simulations are consistent with the profiles and explosion conditions of equivalent two-dimensional CCSN simulations but are ∼102 times faster, and the 1D+ prescription has the potential to be ∼105 faster than three-dimensional CCSN simulations. With further calibration, the 1D+ technique could be ideally suited to test the explodability of thousands of progenitor models.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4bcc