Merging automatic differentiation and the adjoint method for photonic inverse design

Optimizing the shapes and topology of physical devices is crucial for both scientific and technological advancements, given their wide-ranging implications across numerous industries and research areas. Innovations in shape and topology optimization have been observed across a wide range of fields,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Machine learning: science and technology 2024-06, Vol.5 (2), p.25076
Hauptverfasser: Luce, Alexander, Alaee, Rasoul, Knorr, Fabian, Marquardt, Florian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Optimizing the shapes and topology of physical devices is crucial for both scientific and technological advancements, given their wide-ranging implications across numerous industries and research areas. Innovations in shape and topology optimization have been observed across a wide range of fields, notably structural mechanics, fluid mechanics, and more recently, photonics. Gradient-based inverse design techniques have been particularly successful for photonic and optical problems, resulting in integrated, miniaturized hardware that has set new standards in device performance. To calculate the gradients, there are typically two approaches: namely, either by implementing specialized solvers using automatic differentiation (AD) or by deriving analytical solutions for gradient calculation and adjoint sources by hand. In this work, we propose a middle ground and present a hybrid approach that leverages and enables the benefits of AD for handling gradient derivation while using existing, proven but black-box photonic solvers for numerical solutions. Utilizing the adjoint method, we make existing numerical solvers differentiable and seamlessly integrate them into an AD framework. Further, this enables users to integrate the optimization environment seamlessly with other autodifferentiable components such as machine learning, geometry generation, or intricate post-processing which could lead to better photonic design workflows. We illustrate the approach through two distinct photonic optimization problems: optimizing the Purcell factor of a magnetic dipole in the vicinity of an optical nanocavity and enhancing the light extraction efficiency of a µ LED.
ISSN:2632-2153
2632-2153
DOI:10.1088/2632-2153/ad5411