Presumptive treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in household contacts
SETTING: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a growing global health threat that often requires presumptive treatment in the absence of drug susceptibility testing (DST) results.OBJECTIVE: To compare two approaches to the treatment of MDR-TB contacts with no DST results who develop TB disea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease 2016-03, Vol.20 (3), p.370-375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | SETTING: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a growing global health threat that often requires presumptive treatment in the absence of drug susceptibility testing (DST) results.OBJECTIVE: To compare two approaches to the treatment of MDR-TB contacts with no DST results who develop TB disease.DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults treated for TB disease who were contacts of patients living with MDR-TB. Subjects had been treated according to one of two presumptive treatment strategies: 1) regimens containing exclusively first-line drugs, and 2) regimens that included both first- and second-line drugs that were adjusted if and when DST results became available. The primary endpoint was a composite of death and treatment failure.RESULTS: Household contacts of MDR-TB patients who developed TB disease and were treated with first-line regimens were significantly more likely to experience unfavorable end-of-treatment outcomes than those treated with presumptive MDR-TB regimens (RR 2.88, 95%CI 1.24-6.68).CONCLUSION: Household contacts of MDR-TB patients who develop TB disease but have no DST results should receive regimens containing second-line drugs selected based on the infecting strain of the index patient. Regimens containing only first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs significantly increase the risk of unfavorable outcomes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1027-3719 1815-7920 |
DOI: | 10.5588/ijtld.15.0433 |