Comparison of Two Panoramic Sensor Models for Precise 3D Measurements
In this paper, the system errors produced by the most widely used ideal panoramic camera model for a close-range multi-camera rig are indicated and analytically modeled according to a rigorous panoramic camera model, and a comprehensive comparison between the two models is given. First, the 3D local...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing 2014-03, Vol.80 (3), p.229-238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper, the system errors produced by the most widely used ideal panoramic camera model for a close-range multi-camera rig are indicated and analytically modeled according to a rigorous panoramic camera model, and a comprehensive comparison between the two models is given.
First, the 3D localization errors of the ideal model are analyzed that shows the correlations with the object-image distance and the viewing angles. Second, the epipolar errors are analyzed and are observed to exhibit changes with the rotation angles and z-coordinates of the image points.
Finally, tests are carried out in space resection, epipolar constraints, and bundle adjustment with different sensor models. The outdoor tests with small object-image distance (several meters) show the difference between the two models is notably slight. In contrast, the indoor tests with
larger object-image distance (more than 15 m) show the rigorous model produces 2 cm better measurement accuracy than the ideal. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0099-1112 2374-8079 |
DOI: | 10.14358/PERS.80.3.229 |