Cemented versus uncemented socket in hip arthroplasty: A radiostereometric study of 60 randomized hips followed for 2 years
60 patients with arthrosis who received a Charnley total hip replacement were randomly assigned to either an uncemented porous Harris-Galante type I socket or a cemented all-polyethylene Charnley socket. Socket migration and rotation were studied by radiostereometry (RSA) for 2 years. After 2 years,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta orthopaedica 1994, Vol.65 (5), p.517-521 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 60 patients with arthrosis who received a Charnley total hip replacement were randomly assigned to either an uncemented porous Harris-Galante type I socket or a cemented all-polyethylene Charnley socket. Socket migration and rotation were studied by radiostereometry (RSA) for 2 years. After 2 years, all sockets were still in situ. There was no difference in migration or rotation between the 2 socket designs, nor was there any difference in pain or function.
We conclude that the initial fixation of the Harris-Galante socket resembles that of the Charnley socket. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-3674 0001-6470 1745-3682 |
DOI: | 10.3109/17453679409000904 |