Gymnastics: Comparative analysis of selected Biomechanic characteristics between a support backward swing and support swing for the 1#fr1/4> straddle-piked forward salto on the parallel bars
The aim of our research was to study the relationships between performance variables in a support backward swing (SBS), which was used as a progressive step in the learning procedure for a 1#fr1/4> straddle-piked front somersault and the swing prior to a 1#fr1/4> straddle-piked front somersaul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sports biomechanics 2002-01, Vol.1 (1), p.69-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The aim of our research was to study the relationships between performance variables in a support backward swing (SBS), which was used as a progressive step in the learning procedure for a 1#fr1/4> straddle-piked front somersault and the swing prior to a 1#fr1/4> straddle-piked front somersault from support to bent arm support on the parallel bars (5/4S). Mitja Petkovšek, parallel bars gold medallist at the 2000 EC in Bremen, performed these elements. Kinematic analysis involved CMAS software (Praha, 1993), and the Suskana body segment model that has 17 points and 15 segments. Kinetic variables were estimated using 2D IMGIM software, which has 8 points and 6 segments (Colja and Čuk, 1994). The results indicated that some kinematic aspects of the two types of swings were similar but there were important differences in kinetic aspects of the motion. During the swing for the 5/4S, force and torque were higher than in the SBS. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-3141 1752-6116 |
DOI: | 10.1080/14763140208522787 |