Against indifference
The idea that university teachers have a public responsibility appears to have been consigned by many to a lumber room of memory. Ideas of objectivity or expertise correspond more closely to a market-orientated higher education system which takes some pride in serving corporate, rather than social i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Teaching in higher education 2003-10, Vol.8 (4), p.493-503 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The idea that university teachers have a public responsibility appears to have been consigned by many to a lumber room of memory. Ideas of objectivity or expertise correspond more closely to a market-orientated higher education system which takes some pride in serving corporate, rather than social interests. Yet the obligation of the teacher to produce critically aware and engaged students demands that the classroom be a place of exchange-of knowledge, experience, passions and aspirations. As public intellectuals, if that is what we choose to be, the onus is on us to maintain a dream, affirm the creative and imaginative possibilities of those with whom we learn. Argument, debate, doubt are the stuff of human liberation; they are also the only known antidote to indifference. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1356-2517 1470-1294 |
DOI: | 10.1080/1356251032000117580 |