Against indifference

The idea that university teachers have a public responsibility appears to have been consigned by many to a lumber room of memory. Ideas of objectivity or expertise correspond more closely to a market-orientated higher education system which takes some pride in serving corporate, rather than social i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Teaching in higher education 2003-10, Vol.8 (4), p.493-503
1. Verfasser: Gonzalez, Mike
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The idea that university teachers have a public responsibility appears to have been consigned by many to a lumber room of memory. Ideas of objectivity or expertise correspond more closely to a market-orientated higher education system which takes some pride in serving corporate, rather than social interests. Yet the obligation of the teacher to produce critically aware and engaged students demands that the classroom be a place of exchange-of knowledge, experience, passions and aspirations. As public intellectuals, if that is what we choose to be, the onus is on us to maintain a dream, affirm the creative and imaginative possibilities of those with whom we learn. Argument, debate, doubt are the stuff of human liberation; they are also the only known antidote to indifference.
ISSN:1356-2517
1470-1294
DOI:10.1080/1356251032000117580