HISTORY IS NOT HISTORICISM
Nassim Taleb's dismissal of history as based on the "narrative fallacy"-which reads our present knowledge of past events into our reconstruction of the past-is based on a fundamental misconception of what historians actually do. Historians do not, as Taleb presumes, try to infer gener...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical review (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2009-01, Vol.21 (4), p.467-474 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nassim Taleb's dismissal of history as based on the "narrative fallacy"-which reads our present knowledge of past events into our reconstruction of the past-is based on a fundamental misconception of what historians actually do. Historians do not, as Taleb presumes, try to infer general, predictive laws from "hard" facts, as do natural scientists; instead their aim is to discover the causes of unique historical facts among antecedent facts. This is no different, in principle, from "narrating" the cause of a supernova by referring to physical causes. The construction of universal historical laws would admittedly be a fool's errand, but that is not the task historians-as opposed to historicists-actually set for themselves. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0891-3811 1933-8007 |
DOI: | 10.1080/08913810903441401 |