HISTORY IS NOT HISTORICISM

Nassim Taleb's dismissal of history as based on the "narrative fallacy"-which reads our present knowledge of past events into our reconstruction of the past-is based on a fundamental misconception of what historians actually do. Historians do not, as Taleb presumes, try to infer gener...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical review (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2009-01, Vol.21 (4), p.467-474
1. Verfasser: Callahan, Gene
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Nassim Taleb's dismissal of history as based on the "narrative fallacy"-which reads our present knowledge of past events into our reconstruction of the past-is based on a fundamental misconception of what historians actually do. Historians do not, as Taleb presumes, try to infer general, predictive laws from "hard" facts, as do natural scientists; instead their aim is to discover the causes of unique historical facts among antecedent facts. This is no different, in principle, from "narrating" the cause of a supernova by referring to physical causes. The construction of universal historical laws would admittedly be a fool's errand, but that is not the task historians-as opposed to historicists-actually set for themselves.
ISSN:0891-3811
1933-8007
DOI:10.1080/08913810903441401