Factors affecting the intelligibility of synthesized speech

Intelligibility measures for three speech synthesizers, the Echo IIb™, SmoothTalker™ (version 2.0, male voice), and DECTalk™ ("Perfect Paul") were obtained using two methods of presentation of stimuli (audiotaped vs. live) and two methods of response (written vs. spoken). Twenty adult list...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Augmentative and alternative communication 1995, Vol.11 (2), p.74-78
Hauptverfasser: Scherz, Julie, Beer, Mary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intelligibility measures for three speech synthesizers, the Echo IIb™, SmoothTalker™ (version 2.0, male voice), and DECTalk™ ("Perfect Paul") were obtained using two methods of presentation of stimuli (audiotaped vs. live) and two methods of response (written vs. spoken). Twenty adult listeners each listened to 30 randomized synthesized sentences. Consistent with previous studies, the Echo IIb™ synthesized output was the poorest in terms of intelligibility; the DECTalk™ output was the best. The method of response did not appear to have an effect on the intelligibility measures. However, there was a significant difference between the methods of presentation. All three types of synthesized speech output were more easily understood in the live condition. Implications for future research are discussed.
ISSN:0743-4618
1477-3848
DOI:10.1080/07434619512331277159