Smoking cessation A comparative, randomised study between management in general practice and the behavioural programme SmokEnders

Objective - To compare the effectiveness of two different stop smoking interventions. Design - A randomised, controlled trial. Results based on intention to treat. Setting - Three towns in the south-eastern part of Norway. Interventions - Visits to GP for "practice as usual" (GP group) or...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of primary health care 2000-12, Vol.18 (4), p.247-251
Hauptverfasser: Bakkevig, Oystein, Steine, Siri, Hafenbrädl, Kari von, Lærum, Even
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective - To compare the effectiveness of two different stop smoking interventions. Design - A randomised, controlled trial. Results based on intention to treat. Setting - Three towns in the south-eastern part of Norway. Interventions - Visits to GP for "practice as usual" (GP group) or participation in the behavioural programme SmokEnders (SE group) with follow-up 2 weeks, 2 months and 1 year after an agreed stopping date. Subjects - 139 smokers recruited through open invitation. Main outcome measure - Self-reported smoking stop rate 2 weeks, 2 months and 1 year after an agreed stopping date, completed with biochemical indicators by the 1-year registration. Results ? Two weeks after the agreed cessation date, 10/70 (14%) of the GP group and 46/69 (67%) of the SE group had stopped smoking. After 2 months, 9/70 (13%) in the GP group and 37/69 (54%) in the SE group were non-smokers. One year after cessation 5/70 (7%) in the GP group and 21/69 (30%) in the SE group were non-smokers. Conclusions ? Both interventions were effective as measured by the smoking cessation rate. However, the intervention in the SE group was considerably more effective than in the GP group, which suffered from a sizeable number of drop-outs.
ISSN:0281-3432
1502-7724
DOI:10.1080/028134300448832