Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements

Contemporary mixing methods-centrifugation, vacuum mixing with or without precompression-were compared with manual mixing by testing strength characteristics in accordance with a proposed revision of the international standard for bone cements as applied to 10 cement brands. Simplex® brands and low-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta orthopaedica 1992, Vol.63 (1), p.13-18
Hauptverfasser: Hansen, Dick, Jensen, Jørgen Steen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Contemporary mixing methods-centrifugation, vacuum mixing with or without precompression-were compared with manual mixing by testing strength characteristics in accordance with a proposed revision of the international standard for bone cements as applied to 10 cement brands. Simplex® brands and low-viscosity cements were the strongest, and were not improved by any of the vacuum-mixing procedures. Centrifuging was found unsuitable for low-viscosity cements. Without attaining the strength of the former, the cements best suited for auxiliary mixing methods were CMW-1 ® and Palacos ® brands, which improved 6-11 percent by either of the methods. The Sterivac® system was generally found unacceptable, because about 20 percent of a cement package was retained in the mixing gear, and the application of precompression had no additional effect on compressive and bending strengths.
ISSN:1745-3674
1745-3682
DOI:10.3109/17453679209154841