Comparison of two percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tubes in the nutritional management of ALS patients

Patient care and minimizing complications post gastrostomy have to date received little attention in ALS patients. We compare the complications associated with pigtail and mushroom type percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tubes in this patient group. Patients requiring PRG received either Wills-Og...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 2005-09, Vol.6 (3), p.177-181
Hauptverfasser: Rio, Alan, Ann Ampong, Mary, Turner, Martin R., Shaw, Ashley S., Al-Chalabi, Ammar, Shaw, Chris E., Nigel Leigh, P., Sidhu, Paul S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patient care and minimizing complications post gastrostomy have to date received little attention in ALS patients. We compare the complications associated with pigtail and mushroom type percutaneous radiological gastrostomy tubes in this patient group. Patients requiring PRG received either Wills-OglesbyTM or the skin level EntristarTM. Retrospective review of the clinical notes was performed capturing demographic data, peristomal infection, tube displacement, tube failure, nutritional status, site of disease onset, and survival. Thirty-five patients (Group 1) had the Wills-OglesbyTM tube of which 14 (40%) tubes required replacement. The EntristarTM tube was inserted in 29 patients (Group 2) where 8 (28%) required replacement (NS). The incidence of infection was significantly lower with the EntristarTM tube, (p
ISSN:1748-2968
1466-0822
1471-180X
DOI:10.1080/14660820510035388