Doxazosin GITS versus hydrochlorothiazide as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled hypertension

The objective of this prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm comparative study, with a 4-month follow-up, was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability and metabolic safety of doxazosin GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) 4-8 mg day vs hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood pressure 2003-12, Vol.12 (S2), p.16-21
Hauptverfasser: Campo, Carlos, Segura, Julian, Roldán, Cecilia, Alcázar, José M., Rodicio, José L., Ruilope, Luis M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The objective of this prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm comparative study, with a 4-month follow-up, was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability and metabolic safety of doxazosin GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) 4-8 mg day vs hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25 mg day as add-on therapy in patients not controlled with monotherapy with other drugs. Ninety-eight patients completed the study (mean age 57.4 ± 15 years, 53% female). Mean systolic diastolic blood pressure reduction was 8.2 4.5 mmHg in the HCTZ group and 8.9 5.0 mmHg in the doxazosin GITS group, and a strict blood pressure control was achieved in 79% and 83% of the patients, respectively. The incidence rates of adverse events were low and similar in both groups. However, metabolic differences were seen between the groups, doxazosin GITS vs HCTZ, respectively: total cholesterol (mg dl) 210 ± 53 vs 231 ± 62 (p < 0.05), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mg dl) 139 ± 40 vs 161 ± 57 (p < 0.01), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mg dl) 58 ± 16 vs 48 ± 13 (p < 0.01), HDL total cholesterol ratio 27.6 ± 8 vs 21.2 ± 7 (p < 0.001), plasma uric acid (mg dl) 5.3 ± 2.6 vs 6.8 ± 3.1 (p < 0.05) and serum potassium (mEq l) 4.1 ± 1.3 vs. 3.7 ± 1.2 (p < 0.01). In conclusion, doxazosin GITS has a tolerability and efficacy profile similar to low doses of thiazide diuretics, with a better evolution of metabolic and electrolyte parameters. Therefore, in patients not controlled with monotherapy, doxazosin GITS can be considered an alternative to the addition of thiazide diuretics.
ISSN:0803-7051
0803-8023
1651-1999
DOI:10.1080/08038020310016369