Reduced lengthening index by use of bifocal osteotomy in the tibia: Comparison of monofocal and bifocal procedures with the Ilizarov external fixator
We lengthened 63 tibial segments in 49 patients, performing a monofocal osteotomy on 31 segments and a bifocal osteotomy on 32 segments. In the monofocal osteotomy group, the average lengthening was 4.8 (2.4-7.1) cm with a lengthening index (LI) of 1.7 (0.9-4.4) months/cm. In the bifocal osteotomy g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta orthopaedica 2002, Vol.73 (1), p.93-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We lengthened 63 tibial segments in 49 patients, performing a monofocal osteotomy on 31 segments and a bifocal osteotomy on 32 segments. In the monofocal osteotomy group, the average lengthening was 4.8 (2.4-7.1) cm with a lengthening index (LI) of 1.7 (0.9-4.4) months/cm. In the bifocal osteotomy group, the average lengthening was 7.4 (4.9-10.0) cm and with a LI of 1.0 (0.7-2.1) months/cm. The difference in LI between the groups was statistically significant, but more major complications, like persistent ankle joint contracture and pseudarthrosis in the callotasis lengthening zone, occurred with bifocal lengthening. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-3674 0001-6470 1745-3682 |
DOI: | 10.1080/000164702317281486 |