Challenges in Evaluating Technological Interventions for Affect Regulation
We evaluated whether a vibrotactile breathing pacer would influence two measures of affect during a cognitive stressor. In particular, we examined whether changes in breathing would be evident, and if so, whether these would mediate the effects of breathing pacer on self-report anxiety and skin cond...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on affective computing 2023-07, Vol.14 (3), p.2430-2442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We evaluated whether a vibrotactile breathing pacer would influence two measures of affect during a cognitive stressor. In particular, we examined whether changes in breathing would be evident, and if so, whether these would mediate the effects of breathing pacer on self-report anxiety and skin conductance. Our results were surprising: although we observed the expected effects on breathing, we were unable to demonstrate that changes in breathing parameters were responsible for the observed changes in self-report anxiety. In addition, we failed to show that the pacer had an impact on skin conductance. In this paper, we investigate why we did not observe the expected effects. We believe our negative results have implications for evaluating technological interventions for affect regulation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1949-3045 1949-3045 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TAFFC.2022.3175687 |