Deep-Learning-Based Detection of Segregations for Ultrasonic Testing
Ultrasonic testing (UT) has been used in the industry for many years to successfully detect internal defects in bulk material. This study focuses on the inspection of materials made out of the superalloy IN718 which is often used for manufacturing turbine components. A recent accident in 2016 with a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement 2022, Vol.71, p.1-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Ultrasonic testing (UT) has been used in the industry for many years to successfully detect internal defects in bulk material. This study focuses on the inspection of materials made out of the superalloy IN718 which is often used for manufacturing turbine components. A recent accident in 2016 with a turbine engine failure led to the incorporation of a new type of defect into the portfolio of defect types that UT might be able to detect. This defect called discrete Clean White Spot Segregation poses new challenges to the conventional UT due to its very different material characteristic in comparison to traditional defects such as cracks or voids. Its reliable detection in an industrial setup remains unsolved and requires new nondestructive techniques. To our best knowledge, our work is the first study that uses deep learning techniques in combination with conventional UT for the detection of this kind of defect. For the new approach presented in this article, artificial defects with similar material characteristics as real ones are defined and successfully manufactured. Then a Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network with Attention and Spectral representations (RCAS) is trained and compared with a convolutional neural network and the conventional UT. In the executed experiments, RCAS proves its superior capability of detection with an {\mathrm{ AUC}}_{\mathrm{ ROC}}=0.93 in comparison to conventional UT with an {\mathrm{ AUC}}_{\mathrm{ ROC}}=0.16 over the course of six measurements with three different types of ultrasonic probes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0018-9456 1557-9662 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TIM.2022.3144728 |