Extending the Evaluation of Social Assistive Robots With Accessibility Indicators: The AUSUS Evaluation Framework

The introduction of robots in the real world requires previous evaluation of the envisaged performance. Factors like usability, user experience, social acceptance, or societal impact, among others, have been taken into account in evaluation frameworks defined during the last years. However, one of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on human-machine systems 2021-12, Vol.51 (6), p.601-612
Hauptverfasser: Iglesias, Ana, Garcia, Javier, Garcia-Olaya, Angel, Fuentetaja, Raquel, Fernandez, Fernando, Romero-Garces, Adrian, Marfil, Rebeca, Bandera, Antonio, Ting, Karine Lan Hing, Voilmy, Dimitri, Duenas, Alvaro, Suarez-Mejias, Cristina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The introduction of robots in the real world requires previous evaluation of the envisaged performance. Factors like usability, user experience, social acceptance, or societal impact, among others, have been taken into account in evaluation frameworks defined during the last years. However, one of the most important factors that need to be evaluated in any kind of interaction is whether all the users are able to work with the system with the same opportunities and easiness, and none of the current human-robot interaction (HRI) evaluation frameworks include this factor yet. This article proposes an extension of a popular HRI evaluation framework, including accessibility as a new evaluation factor. The proposed approach, named AUSUS, considers Accessibility, Usability, Social acceptance, User experience, and Societal impact. This article presents a use case of the framework, which is evaluated through a socially assistive robotic platform created to perform comprehensive geriatric assessment: the CLARC system. The details of the evaluation process in a hospital and a retirement home are reported, and the main difficulties and recommendations of using AUSUS are discussed.
ISSN:2168-2291
2168-2305
DOI:10.1109/THMS.2021.3112976