Exploring Common and Label-Specific Features for Multi-Label Learning With Local Label Correlations
In multi-label learning, instances can be associated with a set of class labels. The existing multi-label feature selection (MLFS) methods generally adopt either of these two strategies, namely, selecting a subset of features that is shared by all labels (common features) or exploring the most discr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE access 2020, Vol.8, p.50969-50982 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In multi-label learning, instances can be associated with a set of class labels. The existing multi-label feature selection (MLFS) methods generally adopt either of these two strategies, namely, selecting a subset of features that is shared by all labels (common features) or exploring the most discriminative features for each label (label-specific features). However, both of them can play a key role in the discrimination of different labels. For example, common features can distinguish all labels, and label-specific features contribute to discriminating label's differences. They are important for the discriminability of selected features. On the other hand, it is well-known that exploiting label correlations can advance the performance of MLFS, and label correlations are local and only shared by a data subset in most cases. How to effectively learn and exploit local label correlations in the selection process is significant. In this paper, to address these problems, we propose a novel MLFS framework. Specially, common and label-specific features are simultaneously considered by introducing both l_{2,1} -norm and l_{1} -norm regularizers, local label correlations are automatically learned with probability and learned correlation information is efficiently exploited to help feature selection by constraining label correlations on the output of labels. A comparative study with seven state-of-the-art methods manifests the efficacy of our framework. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980219 |