An evaluation of the JPL TOPSAR for extracting tree heights
The accuracy of the digital elevation model (DEM) generated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) TOPSAR for extracting canopy height is evaluated. For this purpose, an experiment using C-band TOPSAR at the Michigan Forest Test Site (MFTS) in Michigan's Upper Peninsula was conducted. Nearly 25...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2000-11, Vol.38 (6), p.2446-2454 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2454 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2446 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Kobayashi, Y. Sarabandi, K. Pierce, L. Dobson, M.C. |
description | The accuracy of the digital elevation model (DEM) generated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) TOPSAR for extracting canopy height is evaluated. For this purpose, an experiment using C-band TOPSAR at the Michigan Forest Test Site (MFTS) in Michigan's Upper Peninsula was conducted. Nearly 25 forest stands were chosen in MFTS, which included a variety of tree types, tree heights, and densities. For these stands, extensive ground data were also collected. The most important and difficult-to-characterize ground truth parameter was the forest ground level data, which is required for extracting the height of the scattering phase center from the interferometric SAR (INSAR) DEM. To accomplish this, differential Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements were done to accurately (/spl plusmn/5 cm) characterize the elevation of: (1) a grid of points over the forest floor of each stand and (2) numerous ground control points (GCPs) over unvegetated areas. Significant discrepancies between GPS and TOPSAR DEM and between the two TOPSAR DEMS of the same area were observed. The discrepancies are attributed to uncompensated aircraft roll and multipath. An algorithm is developed to remove the residual errors in roll angle using elevation data from: (1) 100-m resolution U.S. Geological Survey DEM and (2) the GPS-measured GCPs. With this: algorithm, the uncertainties are reduced to within 3 m. Still, comparison between the corrected TOPSAR DEMs shows an average periodic height discrepancy along the cross-track direction of about /spl plusmn/5 m. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/36.885193 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_885193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>885193</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1770319382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-3d0fb837bf1241c64eaeaea0059f55853fd643254e4bea722912eeb82b48678d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0clLAzEUBvAgCtbl4NVTUHA5jGZf8FTElYKi9Txkpi_tyDijyVT0vzelpQcPVXLIIb_3CN-H0B4lZ5QSe87VmTGSWr6GelRKkxElxDrqEWpVxoxlm2grxldCqJBU99BFv8Hw6eqp66q2wa3H3QTw_eMADx8en_tP2LcBw1cXXNlVzRh3AQBPoBpPuriDNryrI-wu7m30cn01vLzNBg83d5f9QVYKprqMj4gvDNeFp0zQUglws0OItD79UHI_UoIzKUAU4DRjljKAwrBCGKXNiG-j4_ne99B-TCF2-VsVS6hr10A7jbmlQgnGOE3yaKVMARitNP8HlEQaYv6GWkmegk7wZCWkWhOeejEs0YNf9LWdhiZFmKfuiOKKiYRO56gMbYwBfP4eqjcXvnNK8lnVOVf5vOpkDxcLXSxd7YNryiouByxR2s7C2Z-rCgCWj4sVP7P_q5o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>885063624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of the JPL TOPSAR for extracting tree heights</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Kobayashi, Y. ; Sarabandi, K. ; Pierce, L. ; Dobson, M.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Y. ; Sarabandi, K. ; Pierce, L. ; Dobson, M.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The accuracy of the digital elevation model (DEM) generated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) TOPSAR for extracting canopy height is evaluated. For this purpose, an experiment using C-band TOPSAR at the Michigan Forest Test Site (MFTS) in Michigan's Upper Peninsula was conducted. Nearly 25 forest stands were chosen in MFTS, which included a variety of tree types, tree heights, and densities. For these stands, extensive ground data were also collected. The most important and difficult-to-characterize ground truth parameter was the forest ground level data, which is required for extracting the height of the scattering phase center from the interferometric SAR (INSAR) DEM. To accomplish this, differential Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements were done to accurately (/spl plusmn/5 cm) characterize the elevation of: (1) a grid of points over the forest floor of each stand and (2) numerous ground control points (GCPs) over unvegetated areas. Significant discrepancies between GPS and TOPSAR DEM and between the two TOPSAR DEMS of the same area were observed. The discrepancies are attributed to uncompensated aircraft roll and multipath. An algorithm is developed to remove the residual errors in roll angle using elevation data from: (1) 100-m resolution U.S. Geological Survey DEM and (2) the GPS-measured GCPs. With this: algorithm, the uncertainties are reduced to within 3 m. Still, comparison between the corrected TOPSAR DEMs shows an average periodic height discrepancy along the cross-track direction of about /spl plusmn/5 m.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/36.885193</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied geophysics ; Area measurement ; Biological and medical sciences ; Data mining ; Digital elevation models ; Discrete element method ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Geologic measurements ; Global Positioning System ; Internal geophysics ; Laboratories ; Propulsion ; Satellite navigation systems ; Scattering parameters ; Stands ; Supports ; Synthetic aperture radar interferometry ; Teledetection and vegetation maps ; Testing ; Trees</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2000-11, Vol.38 (6), p.2446-2454</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-3d0fb837bf1241c64eaeaea0059f55853fd643254e4bea722912eeb82b48678d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-3d0fb837bf1241c64eaeaea0059f55853fd643254e4bea722912eeb82b48678d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/885193$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/885193$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=906791$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarabandi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, M.C.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of the JPL TOPSAR for extracting tree heights</title><title>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</title><addtitle>TGRS</addtitle><description>The accuracy of the digital elevation model (DEM) generated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) TOPSAR for extracting canopy height is evaluated. For this purpose, an experiment using C-band TOPSAR at the Michigan Forest Test Site (MFTS) in Michigan's Upper Peninsula was conducted. Nearly 25 forest stands were chosen in MFTS, which included a variety of tree types, tree heights, and densities. For these stands, extensive ground data were also collected. The most important and difficult-to-characterize ground truth parameter was the forest ground level data, which is required for extracting the height of the scattering phase center from the interferometric SAR (INSAR) DEM. To accomplish this, differential Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements were done to accurately (/spl plusmn/5 cm) characterize the elevation of: (1) a grid of points over the forest floor of each stand and (2) numerous ground control points (GCPs) over unvegetated areas. Significant discrepancies between GPS and TOPSAR DEM and between the two TOPSAR DEMS of the same area were observed. The discrepancies are attributed to uncompensated aircraft roll and multipath. An algorithm is developed to remove the residual errors in roll angle using elevation data from: (1) 100-m resolution U.S. Geological Survey DEM and (2) the GPS-measured GCPs. With this: algorithm, the uncertainties are reduced to within 3 m. Still, comparison between the corrected TOPSAR DEMs shows an average periodic height discrepancy along the cross-track direction of about /spl plusmn/5 m.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Area measurement</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Digital elevation models</subject><subject>Discrete element method</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Geologic measurements</subject><subject>Global Positioning System</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Propulsion</subject><subject>Satellite navigation systems</subject><subject>Scattering parameters</subject><subject>Stands</subject><subject>Supports</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar interferometry</subject><subject>Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0196-2892</issn><issn>1558-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0clLAzEUBvAgCtbl4NVTUHA5jGZf8FTElYKi9Txkpi_tyDijyVT0vzelpQcPVXLIIb_3CN-H0B4lZ5QSe87VmTGSWr6GelRKkxElxDrqEWpVxoxlm2grxldCqJBU99BFv8Hw6eqp66q2wa3H3QTw_eMADx8en_tP2LcBw1cXXNlVzRh3AQBPoBpPuriDNryrI-wu7m30cn01vLzNBg83d5f9QVYKprqMj4gvDNeFp0zQUglws0OItD79UHI_UoIzKUAU4DRjljKAwrBCGKXNiG-j4_ne99B-TCF2-VsVS6hr10A7jbmlQgnGOE3yaKVMARitNP8HlEQaYv6GWkmegk7wZCWkWhOeejEs0YNf9LWdhiZFmKfuiOKKiYRO56gMbYwBfP4eqjcXvnNK8lnVOVf5vOpkDxcLXSxd7YNryiouByxR2s7C2Z-rCgCWj4sVP7P_q5o</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>Kobayashi, Y.</creator><creator>Sarabandi, K.</creator><creator>Pierce, L.</creator><creator>Dobson, M.C.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>An evaluation of the JPL TOPSAR for extracting tree heights</title><author>Kobayashi, Y. ; Sarabandi, K. ; Pierce, L. ; Dobson, M.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-3d0fb837bf1241c64eaeaea0059f55853fd643254e4bea722912eeb82b48678d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Area measurement</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Digital elevation models</topic><topic>Discrete element method</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Geologic measurements</topic><topic>Global Positioning System</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Propulsion</topic><topic>Satellite navigation systems</topic><topic>Scattering parameters</topic><topic>Stands</topic><topic>Supports</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar interferometry</topic><topic>Teledetection and vegetation maps</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarabandi, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, M.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kobayashi, Y.</au><au>Sarabandi, K.</au><au>Pierce, L.</au><au>Dobson, M.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of the JPL TOPSAR for extracting tree heights</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle><stitle>TGRS</stitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2446</spage><epage>2454</epage><pages>2446-2454</pages><issn>0196-2892</issn><eissn>1558-0644</eissn><coden>IGRSD2</coden><abstract>The accuracy of the digital elevation model (DEM) generated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) TOPSAR for extracting canopy height is evaluated. For this purpose, an experiment using C-band TOPSAR at the Michigan Forest Test Site (MFTS) in Michigan's Upper Peninsula was conducted. Nearly 25 forest stands were chosen in MFTS, which included a variety of tree types, tree heights, and densities. For these stands, extensive ground data were also collected. The most important and difficult-to-characterize ground truth parameter was the forest ground level data, which is required for extracting the height of the scattering phase center from the interferometric SAR (INSAR) DEM. To accomplish this, differential Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements were done to accurately (/spl plusmn/5 cm) characterize the elevation of: (1) a grid of points over the forest floor of each stand and (2) numerous ground control points (GCPs) over unvegetated areas. Significant discrepancies between GPS and TOPSAR DEM and between the two TOPSAR DEMS of the same area were observed. The discrepancies are attributed to uncompensated aircraft roll and multipath. An algorithm is developed to remove the residual errors in roll angle using elevation data from: (1) 100-m resolution U.S. Geological Survey DEM and (2) the GPS-measured GCPs. With this: algorithm, the uncertainties are reduced to within 3 m. Still, comparison between the corrected TOPSAR DEMs shows an average periodic height discrepancy along the cross-track direction of about /spl plusmn/5 m.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/36.885193</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-2892 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2000-11, Vol.38 (6), p.2446-2454 |
issn | 0196-2892 1558-0644 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_885193 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Algorithms Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied geophysics Area measurement Biological and medical sciences Data mining Digital elevation models Discrete element method Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects. Techniques Geologic measurements Global Positioning System Internal geophysics Laboratories Propulsion Satellite navigation systems Scattering parameters Stands Supports Synthetic aperture radar interferometry Teledetection and vegetation maps Testing Trees |
title | An evaluation of the JPL TOPSAR for extracting tree heights |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20the%20JPL%20TOPSAR%20for%20extracting%20tree%20heights&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Kobayashi,%20Y.&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2446&rft.epage=2454&rft.pages=2446-2454&rft.issn=0196-2892&rft.eissn=1558-0644&rft.coden=IGRSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/36.885193&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E1770319382%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=885063624&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=885193&rfr_iscdi=true |