An Efficient Scheduling Algorithm for Multi-Robot Task Allocation in Assembling Aircraft Structures

Efficient utilization of cooperating robots in the assembly of aircraft structures relies on balancing the workload of the robots and ensuring collision-free scheduling. We cast this problem as that of allocating a large number of repetitive assembly tasks, such as drilling holes and installing fast...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE robotics and automation letters 2019-10, Vol.4 (4), p.3844-3851
Hauptverfasser: Tereshchuk, Veniamin, Stewart, John, Bykov, Nikolay, Pedigo, Samuel, Devasia, Santosh, Banerjee, Ashis G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Efficient utilization of cooperating robots in the assembly of aircraft structures relies on balancing the workload of the robots and ensuring collision-free scheduling. We cast this problem as that of allocating a large number of repetitive assembly tasks, such as drilling holes and installing fasteners, among multiple robots. Such task allocation is often formulated as a traveling salesman problem, which is NP-hard, implying that computing an exactly optimal solution is computationally prohibitive for real-world applications. The problem complexity is further exacerbated by intermittent robot failures necessitating real-time task reallocation. In this letter, we present an efficient method that exploits workpart geometry and problem structure to initially generate balanced and conflict-free robot schedules under nominal conditions. Subsequently, we deal with the failures by allowing the robots to first complete their nominal schedules and then employing a market-based optimizer to allocate the leftover tasks. Results show an improvement of 11.5% in schedule efficiency as compared to an optimized greedy multi-agent scheduler on a four robot system, which is especially promising for aircraft assembly processes that take many hours to complete. Moreover, the computation times are similar and small, typically hundreds of milliseconds.
ISSN:2377-3766
2377-3766
DOI:10.1109/LRA.2019.2929983